facebook rss twitter

Review: AMD Radeon R9 Fury X

by Tarinder Sandhu on 24 June 2015, 13:01

Tags: AMD (NYSE:AMD)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qacsgk

Add to My Vault: x

Conclusion

...We're heartened to see that Fury X propels AMD back into the high-end consumer GPU race; it can go into some tiny systems that GTX 980 Ti cannot.

AMD and Nvidia have taken contrasting approaches for designing premium graphics cards in mid-2015. Hampered by the problems associated with 20nm manufacturing, which was supposed to be prevalent by now, both companies have had to rework architectures for them to be economically feasible on the longstanding 28nm process.

AMD's design choices for the Radeon R9 Fury X put shading and memory bandwidth at the top of the list. On-paper specs blow every other GPU out of the water, as is usually the case, and the tiny form factors available through the use of innovative HBM memory are intriguing and interesting in equal measure - no longer do powerhouse graphics cards need to be big, bulky, loud and unnecessarily thirsty.

The Fury X is, quite easily, the best GPU to come out of AMD. A 40 per cent performance improvement over R9 290X is nothing to sniff at but that, really, is not the real competition. Nvidia's pre-emptive launch of the GeForce GTX 980 Ti uses a more efficient core and regular GDDR5 memory to achieve benchmark performances that are, in our opinion, a little better than the latest Radeon's, perhaps helped in small part by having a larger framebuffer. Partner GTX 980 Ti's are faster still and overclock better than Fury X.

We're heartened to see that Fury X propels AMD back into the high-end consumer GPU race; it can go into some tiny systems that GTX 980 Ti cannot. Real innovation on the memory front and solid performance in games brings it very close to Nvidia's finest right now. Ultimately the premium PC gaming space is now defined by whose ecosystem you prefer - AMD or Nvidia's? FreeSync vs. G-Sync or Catalyst vs. GeForce.

Making a decision between the two heavyweight cards is no easy task, though if it were our money on the table and we had to make a decision, a well-implemented partner GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB would get the nod. Whatever you end up choosing, competition can only be seen as good for the consumer... AMD does manage to provide that with the Fury X.

The Good
 
The Bad
AMD back in the big league
Competitively priced
Runs cool under load
Very quiet
Innovative HBM memory
Looks the business
 
Not quite as fast as GTX 980 Ti
4GB may prove a hurdle at 4K
No overclocking on memory
No HDMI 2.0



AMD Radeon R9 Fury X

HEXUS.where2buy*

The AMD Radeon R9 Fury X graphics card will be available to purchase from Scan Computers.

HEXUS.right2reply

At HEXUS, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any company representatives for the products reviewed choose to respond, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.



*UK-based HEXUS community members are eligible for free delivery and priority customer service through the SCAN.care@HEXUS forum.



HEXUS Forums :: 130 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Well a tad underwhelming to say the least, was expecting it to tip the 980ti off the top spot which at the moment looks the better buy with HDMI 2 and Direct X 12.1. Maybe next year.

Also why no 390X results in the chart?
They were tested anachronistically - Fury X first - and the 390X would be the only non-reference card. I will however add it in.
Jasp
Well a tad underwhelming to say the least, was expecting it to tip the 980ti off the top spot which at the moment looks the better buy with HDMI 2 and Direct X 12.1. Maybe next year.

I agree it's underwhelming but I sorta knew it was heading for that last week so no great surprise.

If you really need HDMI 2 you can get an adapter. DirectX 12 is heavily based on Mantle - how can Nvidia cards be better equipped than AMD's for it? They don't even have asynchronous shaders which will be a mainstay of the API.
Tarinder
They were tested anachronistically - Fury X first - and the 390X would be the only non-reference card. I will however add it in.

Ah different review embargoes cool.

I agree it's underwhelming but I sorta knew it was heading for that last week so no great surprise.

If you really need HDMI 2 you can get an adapter. DirectX 12 is heavily based on Mantle - how can Nvidia cards be better equipped than AMD's for it? They don't even have asynchronous shaders which will be a mainstay of the API.

From what i understand DX12 is built from the ground up by Microsoft, it basically does the same thing as Mantle but is not the same. What will be interesting is how this performs against the 980ti in DX12 as on paper the Fury should be quite a bit faster then it.
So the 980ti wins in every single benchmark at 1080p, that's a shame. The extra bandwidth from HBM pays off and the Fury X catches up as you crank the resolution, but I suspect the vast majority of gamers are still “only” on 1080p.

Any idea when we'll see pricing and reviews of the R9 Nano?