facebook rss twitter

Review: Sapphire Radeon R9 290X Vapor-X 8GB

by Tarinder Sandhu on 6 November 2014, 06:00

Tags: Sapphire, AMD (NYSE:AMD)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qack4n

Add to My Vault: x

Conclusion

Beautifully built and hitting many of the right notes, the £360 Vapor-X 8GB is, at the moment, a niche product for a niche audience.

The decision for AMD to enable partners to build Radeon R9 290X cards with an 8GB framebuffer is an attempt to extend the longevity of the Hawaii architecture. Bigger numbers also continue to be marketing draws in certain countries, with AMD keen to exploit any perceived advantage since the launch of the GeForce GTX 980 GPU a short while ago.

In-game truth is more prosaic. The 8GB framebuffer does little to positively impact gaming performance in the vast array of current gaming titles and engines, even at a 4K resolution twinned with high-quality settings. We need to cherry-pick examples of where the extra memory comes into play. This state of affairs may change when multiple 8GB-equipped cards in CrossFire are taken into account, thereby putting the burden on the framebuffer to a larger degree.

It can be successfully argued that graphics cards housing 8GB of memory will become the norm at some point. The question that's more pertinent is whether the £70 premium - Sapphire's Vapor-X 4GB sells for £290 - is worth it. Right now that answer is no for most readers, though this sentiment is likely to change over time.

Sapphire makes one of the finest Radeon R9 290X on the market in the form of the tri-fan Vapor-X. Beautifully built and hitting many of the right notes, the £360 Vapor-X 8GB is, at the moment, a niche product for a niche audience.

The Good
 
The Bad
Great build quality
Looks the business
OC'd on core and memory
Free game bundle
Can be pushed further
 
8GB buffer has limited benefits
£70 premium over 4GB card



Sapphire Radeon R9 290X Vapor-X 8GB

HEXUS.where2buy

The Sapphire Radeon R9 290X 8GB card is available to purchase for £360 from Overclockers UK using code HEXUS8GB.

HEXUS.right2reply

At HEXUS, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any company representatives for the products reviewed choose to respond, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.



HEXUS Forums :: 17 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
hexus
You'd think that Sapphire's overclocked Vapor-X, with 8GB of GDDR5 memory in tow, would consumer more power than a reference Radeon R9 290. That doesn't appear to be the case in our benchmarks, suggesting that AMD's press cards are overvolted.
Well easy enough to see - what are the volts?
Just ordered an MSI 970gtx frozr V which, going by what I have read more than likely hits 980 performance when OC'd.
Did contemplate a 290X but even with this new offering I'm feeling I made the right call.
Bit of a shame as my current card is a 660ti, previous a 5850 and an 8800gtx before that.
I usually like to swap from Ati/AMD to Nvidia each time I get a new card but it's getting harder each generation.
Plasmastorm
Just ordered an MSI 970gtx frozr V which, going by what I have read more than likely hits 980 performance when OC'd.
Did contemplate a 290X but even with this new offering I'm feeling I made the right call.
Bit of a shame as my current card is a 660ti, previous a 5850 and an 8800gtx before that.
I usually like to swap from Ati/AMD to Nvidia each time I get a new card but it's getting harder each generation.

yah, but also GTX 980 hits 980 Ti (not released yet or whatever card that will be next) when OCed, so the argument of reach 980 when 970 is OCed is not valid.
YazX
yah, but also GTX 980 hits 980 Ti (not released yet or whatever card that will be next) when OCed
How do you know?
YazX
Plasmastorm
Just ordered an MSI 970gtx frozr V which, going by what I have read more than likely hits 980 performance when OC'd.
Did contemplate a 290X but even with this new offering I'm feeling I made the right call.
Bit of a shame as my current card is a 660ti, previous a 5850 and an 8800gtx before that.
I usually like to swap from Ati/AMD to Nvidia each time I get a new card but it's getting harder each generation.

yah, but also GTX 980 hits 980 Ti (not released yet or whatever card that will be next) when OCed, so the argument of reach 980 when 970 is OCed is not valid.


That's just a guess. Have you just made a completely random guess at the end of a very comprehensive test?

-sigh-