Comparative Performance, Bang4Buck
We can also take a closer look at overall comparative performance and then evaluate the value proposition by factoring price into the equation.
To do this, we take the benchmark scores from each card at 2,560x1,440 - the optimum resolution - and then normalise all cards to the Inno3D's performance, which is set to 100 per cent. The final result is an average normalised performance across the four games in this review.
The calculations show that Inno3D's card is a tad faster than the Radeon RX Vega 56, a fair bit quicker than the GTX 1070, which pulls 86 per cent of its numbers, while the GeForce GTX 1080 OC and Radeon RX Vega 64 are 10.5 and 13.9 per cent faster, respectively.
These at-a-glance figures show you just where the Inno3D sits in the performance pecking order, and the numbers accurately reflect its intended positioning, as we have mentioned before.
We can also factor price into account. Here, the RX Vega 56, priced from £390 and therefore £60 cheaper than the Inno3D, jumps to the top of the pack, closely followed by the £455 RX Vega 64.
Generally keeping a long-standing theme going, Nvidia cards tend to be somewhat more expensive than performance-equivalent AMD competitors, though such an assertion doesn't take power consumption, temperatures, or noise into account.
