facebook rss twitter

Review: AMD FX-8320E 95W (32nm Vishera)

by Ryan Martin on 2 January 2015, 13:00

Tags: AMD (NYSE:AMD)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qacm3b

Add to My Vault: x

Conclusion

For a measly £110 an eight-core AMD FX CPU, with full overclocking support, can be yours for the taking.

The addition of E-Series parts to AMD's FX eight-core line of processors may not be glamorous but, we believe, it's a positive move that AMD is giving consumers a greater range of options. AMD doesn't charge a premium for the FX-8320E and FX-8370E suggesting that the chips are nothing more than frequency-capped variants of their namesakes. This point is further reinforced by the fact both E-Series parts are just as amenable to overclocking as other eight-core FX parts, 4.8 to 5GHz is a realistic goal.

Painting a complete picture with our results it is easy to see that the TDP reduction from 125W to 95W equates to only modest drops in power consumption, so small that benchmarking with a different motherboard wiped out said power-savings. The reduction in performance relative to the reduction in power consumption reveals the limitations of AMD's Piledriver architecture. Simply put, power consumption doesn't scale down very well with lower frequencies.

We believe that most consumers would be better served by getting the identically-priced FX-8320 and FX-8370 parts. The 20 to 30-watts less power consumption of the E-Series is unlikely to make AMD's eight-core FX parts noticeably easier to cool, or more suitable for small form factor systems. Where the E-Series parts do make sense is for current AM3+ system owners with 95W-socket motherboards. In these instances the latest eight-core FX parts offer a tasty hassle-free upgrade from ageing 95W FX-4000 and FX-6000 parts.

In the desktop CPU market AMD trails Intel in numerous areas - single threaded performance, power consumption and the currentness of motherboard offerings. AMD does, critically, still hold a wildcard in the form of its value proposition. For a measly £110 an eight-core AMD FX CPU, with full overclocking support, can be yours for the taking. Against Intel's equivalently priced offerings, notably the Haswell Core i3s, AMD's FX remains a viable alternative.

The Good
 
The Bad

Strong multi-core performance
Excellent value for money
Easy upgrade for AM3+ owners

 
Power savings are small
Limited single-core speed

 

HEXUS.where2buy

TBC.

HEXUS.right2reply

At HEXUS, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any company representatives for the products reviewed choose to respond, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.



HEXUS Forums :: 18 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Still cannot outclass the i5. Sigh!
The review starts by saying the part is priced against i3 CPUs, and then fails to include an i3 in the benchmarks?

I still came away thinking that these E CPUs are a niche product for people with existing motherboards that can't take a full fat FX CPU. The FX8350 still seems the best of the AMD parts here.
OilSheikh
Still cannot outclass the i5. Sigh!

the i5 also outclassed one of the i7's in gaming; its a quality processor. For £30 less this is still a decent CPU from the benchmarks. for 1080p gaming, that £30 would be better off in a GPU.
Bit silly putting the 5960x up there but not the similarly priced i3.
Yup bit confused with this as you start out with saying the price is inline with the i3 range so why not include the i3 part within the test guys? We all know by now that what Company A thinks their product competes with from Company B is invalid so please just go by price!

Also the fact that the motherboard looks to be taking an extra 19w at idle means the power consumption benchmark is irrelevant, you're saying it should be similar to the 8730e but it should still be slightly lower than this based on the clocks no? so there is a difference in power usage, really should just exclude this as the motherboard has tainted those results.

With regards to the gaming section I would suggest you look at the difference as a whole as it would show it differently, for instance vs the i5 its £40 you said so I just had a quick google and you can get the GTX 770 for £250 and the GTX 780TI for £290, thats £40 of a quick google so comparing those two cards, i5 + 770 vs FX 8320e + 780TI how does it fair in the gameplay area? It probably does better therefore it is a better buy than the i5 surprisingly.

Hoping the next AMD architecture rectifies the issues with initial bulldozer design so they can finally be back on top :D.