vacancies advertise contact news tip The Vault
facebook rss twitter

Intel Optane cache drives don't play with budget Kaby Lake CPUs

by Mark Tyson on 31 March 2017, 12:01

Tags: Intel (NASDAQ:INTC)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qadfwp

Add to My Vault: x

Earlier this week Intel launched the first Optane products for consumers: its 16GB and 32GB Optane Memory M.2 modules. When we first heard about Optane it was all about offering faster than SSD performance - existing in the space between SSD and DRAM - but these limited capacity modules are targeted at the "79 per cent of desktop PCs," still using HDDs as primary storage. It might be fair to assume that a good proportion of these are utilitarian pre-built systems, many using Pentium or Celeron processors. But that's a snag…

It was already well publicised that Optane requires an Intel Kaby Lake processor / 200 series motherboard and motherboard makers have been updating BIOS downloads to support the new 'memory' devices this week. However, there is another caveat, as spotted by the TechReport. In the official list of requirements to support Optane technology Intel states users must have a Core i3, i5 or i7 Kaby Lake processor equipped. This leaves non-Core processors like Pentiums and Celerons, lower power 'T' chips, and even the Core-Y series laptops in the cold, even if they are indeed seventh generation processors. This lack of compatibility isn't a promotional website blurb oversight, as it's backed up by individual processor ARK database entries.

Since Intel is actively marketing the new consumer 'Optane Memory' cache drives as ideal for boosting budget-friendly mainstream systems with hard drives as their sole storage devices, it seems to have shot itself in the foot. If building a new system with Optane cached HDD primary you will have to budget for at least a Core i3-7100 which adds $65+ to your build price, says the TechReport. It suggests dropping the entry level 16GB Optane M2, the Kaby Lake i3, and 1TB HDD in favour of something like an OCZ SSD with 480GB of storage. However, as with any PC build decisions there are almost endless permutations to consider.

click to zoom and read small print

Unfortunately, as yet, we at HEXUS haven't had any time with these new 'Optane Memory' caching products in order to assess them and see if they are worth considering. It is hoped that any Micron produced 3D Xpoint consumer drives don't include processor family restrictions.



HEXUS Forums :: 27 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Yayyyy more ground breaking technology that segments the market.
It's not great, but in reality how many people with a CPU in a lower tier than an i3 (or even an i5 in most cases) are really going to be considering one of these?
EvilCycle
It's not great, but in reality how many people with a CPU in a lower tier than an i3 (or even an i5 in most cases) are really going to be considering one of these?

Possibly quite a few. If you can afford a top end CPU you probably have a 1TB SSD and little use for any piffling cache technology. If you are on a budget, you are more likely to have spinning rust that will benefit from a cache SSD, and if a spending a bit more gets you a better cache SSD perhaps you will stump up for it?

Can only guess, I think Optane is a waste of money, I'm clearly not the target market.
Agreed, cache drives are for people on low-end systems who want a bit of oomph. High end systems already have NVMe drives. I'm interested in seeing 500gig Optane drives.