facebook rss twitter

EVGA’s E779 X79 Classified - a peek at extreme things to come

by Alistair Lowe on 17 October 2011, 13:55

Tags: EVGA

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qa7ov

Add to My Vault: x

It seems that a fair few new enthusiast products reared their heads at this year's NVIDIA GeForce LAN event, among them was EVGA's X79 Classified E779 high-end Intel Sandy Bridge E motherboard.

Most of the details are still shrouded in mystery but a lot can be ascertained from images and titbits of information provided at the event.

Image credit: Hardware Canucks

The design screams throughout of overclock streamlining. Two 8-pin CPU connectors provide a high-quality and ample power feed, a right-angled 24-pin connector allowing room for large cooling solutions, native 4-way SLI, the use of POSCAP capacitors to provide a more predictable and stable power supply response over and range of conditions, the use of fewer, tightly-packed integrated ICs and uniformly-spaced RAM slot pairs to provide uniformity and consistent component response. Phew!

The must-have high-end overclocking features are present, including on-board Bluetooth, which, though functionality is unconfirmed, if it follows trend will likely allow for wireless adjustment of voltages and frequencies, independent of an operating system for those wishing to push their systems to the limit; a supplied EVBot overclocking tool is further indication.

Power and reset buttons are on-board with voltage probe points present for those who just don't believe what the BIOS is telling them, and a plethora of high-end connections - 8x USB 3.0, 2x SATA 3, 4x SATA 2, dual Gigabit Ethernet ports, power and reset buttons.

Though only time and benchmarking will tell, the EVGA E779 certainly appears to have the right formula for high-end overclocking. We're sure HEXUS.labs will love to get its hands on one these and take it apart.



HEXUS Forums :: 5 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Looks completely over the top, a complete waste of time and no doubt an absurd amount of money.

Wish these stupid companies would concentrate on making the best value products better instead of taking viagra in an attempt to grow the largest penis.
Yet another motherboard from EVGA that'll need a case from a particular range it would seem. Do I count 9-10 expansion slots from the base of the audio ports? And what's the point in all that PCB space if they can't even add in an extra controller for some more SATA6 ports? I do hope they follow this up with a more mainstream version without quad sli support (dual is fine for most of us).

I agree with Brewster, they should focus on value and quality over ‘extreme features’. Although, that said, the SR-2 was a good break from the norm. But that was built on an already well-developed platform.
Guys this is high end, not mainstream. High End chips that will cost up to, and probably exceeding a grand. These are not disposable benching rigs, but high end, server class boards, for the wealthy. I repeat, the chipset is NOT going to be entry level stuff, so why should the boards be? Why would you put a shiny new £200+ cpu into a board that's not up to doing the job?
If you're going to buy a quad channel CPU, and want to push it to its absolute limit, you're not generally going to be gaming - more likely benching, folding, or buiding your own terminal server/render farm.
This is a VERY niche market, with a high development cost, and therefore even higher retail point, so please put your comments into a context and quit your whining about “it probably being expensive.” It will be. PERIOD. If you want a desktop machine, buy a Sandy Bridge. This is for Socket 2011 cpus and will be a beast.

Would love to get one of these as my server….
AdamHiggins
Yet another motherboard from EVGA that'll need a case from a particular range it would seem. Do I count 9-10 expansion slots from the base of the audio ports?
When was your last eye test? :p
kalniel
When was your last eye test? :p
I said counting from the base of the audio ports., which is usually where slot 1 is, this board is missing any PCI sockets in slots 1 and 2. I count:

1: Missing
2: Missing
3: 16x
4: 1x
5:16x
6:16x
7:16x
8: Missing
9: 16x
+ Board space below

So yeah, I meant total slot positions, not physical sockets on the board.