facebook rss twitter

TSMC starts volume production of 16nm chips

by Mark Tyson on 14 August 2015, 12:06

Tags: TSMC, Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qactr5

Add to My Vault: x

TSMC has released a statement saying that its "16nm [chips] smoothly entered volume production as expected". The contract chipmaker was nudged into informing investors about the start of volume production following a report that suggested Apple was cutting its orders with TSMC, and placing bigger orders with Samsung Electronics and GlobalFoundries. Obviously such speculation was playing havoc with TSMC's share price, which had hit a nine month low.

In line with the above news, TSMC is devoting its first production runs to meeting demand for Apple SoCs, reports WCCFTech. There is a long list of other companies waiting to get their wares made on the new 16nm process, these include; Avago, Freescale, LG, MediaTek and Nvidia. AMD wasn't on the (slightly old) list seen by WCCFTech. In 2016 AMD will start to get its Zen micro-architecture CPUs and Arctic Islands GPUs made on a FinFET process but we don't know much more about the practical manufacturing details yet.

TSMC has also announced that it will ramp up "an enhanced version of 16nm chips, or 16 FinFET+ chips, in the third quarter and that production would reach a high volume in the same quarter," reports the Taipei Times. It is this process upon which Nvidia is going to depend for its next-generation GP100 Pascal GPU. Pascal reportedly has 17 billion transistors and up to 32GB of HBM2 based vRAM.

The 16nm FinFET+ node from TSMC is expected to deliver twice the density and 65 per cent higher speed at 70 per cent less power than the current 28HPM process. With things starting to roll at TSMC, we will likely see an announcement by Nvidia in Q1 2016 with Pascal-based products becoming available around Q2 2016.



HEXUS Forums :: 13 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
So I should wait instead of upgrading to an R9 390?
PuremasterZ
So I should wait instead of upgrading to an R9 390?

Yes, and then when the 16nm chips are first out you should wait again, because better chips will come later. And then when those better chips are out, you should still wait, because yet better chips will still be coming… ;)
heh, it's true you could end up waiting forever just because there's something new around the corner ;)

But personally, in terms of the R9 390 (X), I wouldn't buy one now because we know for absolutely sure that AMD are going to release the R9 Nano, a lower-power version of the Fury, in the next month or two. It should perform better than a 390 whilst drawing less power. Price is still an unknown, but it's certainly possible that it'll push the prices of the 390 and 390X down, since they're the cards immediately below it in the product stack. And if that doesn't happen, it probably still worth waiting in case you can stretch your budget to one and it turns out to be a really good card.
kalniel
PuremasterZ
So I should wait instead of upgrading to an R9 390?

Yes, and then when the 16nm chips are first out you should wait again, because better chips will come later. And then when those better chips are out, you should still wait, because yet better chips will still be coming… ;)
I see what you did there
kalniel
Yes, and then when the 16nm chips are first out you should wait again, because better chips will come later. And then when those better chips are out, you should still wait, because yet better chips will still be coming… ;)

Indeed, generally the best advice is to upgrade when you need to :P. However I think this next generation is different, we have been stuck on the 28nm node for several years and you can only go so far with architecture changes with the same ingredients and limitations, the generation that move to 14/16nm will be providing a significant boost in rendering power compared to each generation jump we have since the AMD 7000 series so if the money isnt burning a hole its best to hold off for this gen only :D