facebook rss twitter

Intel refreshes Atom for home storage

by Pete Mason on 17 August 2010, 10:06

Tags: Atom D425 1.66 GHz, Intel (NASDAQ:INTC)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qazli

Add to My Vault: x

Back in March Intel kicked off its efforts to get its low-power Atom CPUs into home servers and NAS devices.  Since then, the company has clearly gained some traction in the market and we've seen quite a few products that take advantage of the platform.

Now Intel has its foot in the door, it's releasing two chips that bump up the clock speeds and move the platform up to DDR3 memory.

The new D425 - a successor to the old D410 - is a single-core processor clocked at 1.8GHz, whilst the D525 is a dual-core version running at the same speed, and is the same CPU that we've seen popping up in a few upcoming nettops and netbooks.

The platform will still leverage the same 82801 IR input/output controller, but the speed boost should make the chips more capable, while the move to lower-voltage DDR3 should help to reduce power consumption that little bit further.

Intel has managed to gather a good number of partners for its first platform, so expect to see boxes from manufacturers like QNAP, Thecus, Synology, Cisco and LaCie appearing in the near future.



HEXUS Forums :: 7 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Are these 64bit chips? I can never keep up with the specs of the Atom chips, their names make zero sense to me.

I hope they are as the next release of WHS, being based on Windows Server 2008 R2, is 64bit only.
Funkstar
Are these 64bit chips?

They sure are. All of the current-gen Atom chips (D4xx, D5xx, N4xx) support 64-bit to the best of my knowledge.
OK, thanks for that BullDogg :)
Was the first thing I checked when I heard about Vail, had a horrible feeling that I wasn't going to be able to upgrade my Tranquil. I think it was only the very early single-core Atoms that didn't have 64 bit capability.
Funkstar
Are these 64bit chips? I can never keep up with the specs of the Atom chips, their names make zero sense to me.

I hope they are as the next release of WHS, being based on Windows Server 2008 R2, is 64bit only.

Full 2008 R2 runs nicely on the 510 with 2GB RAM, it's a bit slow on the desktop when using Server Manager etc but can perform it's background server duties more than well enough, for <20 Watts.