facebook rss twitter

Xbox 360 Valhalla chipset pictured, sparks rumours of a slim Microsoft console

by Parm Mann on 17 March 2010, 09:53

Tags: Xbox 360, Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT), Xbox 360

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qawnh

Add to My Vault: x

An image of what is believed to be a forthcoming Xbox 360 chipset revision has been leaked onto the Internet.

The board, pictured below, is said to be the successor to the current chipset - codenamed Jasper - and features both the Xbox 360 GPU and CPU on a single die.

The combination of the two is believed to have been made possible by a die shrink, presumably to 45nm.

Thought to be codenamed Valhalla, the chipset appears to be a drastic redesign from current Xbox 360 boards. The Valhalla PCB (printed circuit board) appears to be smaller than all previous iterations, and a shuffle of I/O port positioning suggests that the board will surface in a new Xbox 360 chassis.

It could just as easily be an early prototype - or even a fake - but speculation regarding the fabled Xbox 360 Slim is now likely to pick up pace.

Judging by the image, it seems Microsoft's process shrink could pave the way for multiple developments. We could see a smaller, trimmed-down Xbox 360 console ala the PlayStation 3 Slim, or we could see Microsoft retain its current chassis and squeeze external components into its existing design - the power supply comes to mind.

Looking ahead, the introduction of a new Xbox 360 model could be timed to debut alongside Project Natal late in 2010. Conjecturing somewhat, could Microsoft be developing a console with Natal built in? It isn't outside the realms of possibility, we reckon.

Want to know what came before Valhalla and Jasper? Here's a brief outline of past, present and future Xbox 360 chipsets:

  Xenon Zephyr Falcon Opus Jasper Valhalla
Estimated launch date Q4 2005 Q3 2007 Q3 2007 Q2 2008 Q3 2008 Q4 2010?
CPU process 90nm 90nm 65nm 65nm 65nm CPU and GPU on single die (45nm?)
GPU process 90nm 90nm 90nm 90nm 65nm
HDMI output No Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Power supply 203W 203W 175W 175W 150W <150W?


HEXUS Forums :: 21 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Not sure which rev this board is, but it looks like it would be the original as it was published in 2005



There has been a hell of a simplification when you compare the two. Must be quite a cost reduction too.

(It is the original as it has the 4 pin mini molex connector for the system fan instead of a standard 3 pin fan header)
Big change (if legit)

The idea of Natal built in makes sense but consdiering we don't even know the form it is due to take yet (and you'll always need an external camera) maybe not?

I'm trying to figure out the layout of both boards though, top of the 2005 pick looks like the front (2 mem slots, usb & IR?) The bottom of the new pic looks like the front (1 mem slot, USB?) much smaller gap between the two. Lining up component size it looks like the new one is ~ 1/3 smaller (not in width though) and doesnt have any parts jutting out so not a massive difference but welcome nonetheless!
Coolermaster fan? Really?

I find it odd they combine the two, sure less components to manufacture, but surely the heat output would be more concentrated coming from one die?
If it's only a test model then maybe yeah (?)

2 x SATA ports, loads of empty headers on the board as well? Some commentors on Kotaku have come up with a few technical reasons why this is a fake, who knows but I'd be more suprised if there wasn't a new revision in the works!
the thing is even with the reduction its still a very hot CPU and very hot GPU being bound to 1 socket, it just seems so unlikely