facebook rss twitter

Xbox One uses cloud to render “latency-insensitive” graphics

by Mark Tyson on 24 May 2013, 13:45

Tags: Xbox, PlayStation

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qabwnj

Add to My Vault: x

Now people have had some significant details of both the Sony PlayStation 4 and the Microsoft Xbox One, opinions, preferences and choices are already forming. Most things I have read show that the PlayStation 4 is now a clear early favourite. This may be something to do with Microsoft’s TV/media focus during its reveal presentation, where games seemed to come last. Or it may be something to do with the hardware; the PS4 appears to have the edge over the Xbox One with a significantly higher number of GPU cores and faster system memory with many other aspects of the systems being similar. However, on the graphics side of things, I read today about Microsoft planning to use a cloud of 300,000 servers to render the Xbox One’s “latency-insensitive” graphics.

Ars Technica talked to General Manager of Redmond Game Studios and Platforms, Matt Booty about this server cloud. Ars wanted to know how “laggy cloud data” could help in a fast paced game. “Things that I would call latency-sensitive would be reactions to animations in a shooter, reactions to hits and shots in a racing game, reactions to collisions,” Microsoft’s Booty told Ars. “Those things you need to have happen immediately and on frame and in sync with your controller. There are some things in a video game world, though, that don't necessarily need to be updated every frame or don't change that much in reaction to what's going on.”

Booty gave an example of the utility of a powerful cloud computer with regard to in-game lighting where “things often involve some complicated up-front calculations when you enter that world, but they don’t necessarily have to be updated every frame”. Also physics modelling, fluid dynamics, and cloth motion can be handled by the cloud without adding lag to gameplay. Booty suggested that the power available in the cloud to a single Xbox One user would be equivalent to about three Xbox One consoles working together. Developers will have to decide for themselves in how to manage what is being offloaded to the cloud.

Turning to the use of internet and what might happen if an Xbox One user has a disrupted connection Booty said “If there’s a fast connection and if the cloud is available and if the scene allows it, you’re obviously going to capitalize on that”. If a connection drops the game will “have to intelligently handle that” he added – however that implies that graphics would suffer in this case. This is quite a lot different to how the Sony PS4 will use cloud computing to allow ‘backwards compatibility’, or rather streaming, of previous generation PlayStation games.

Xbox One and YouView

In related news and probably only of interest to UK residents, YouView has confirmed it has no plans to support the Xbox One. The YouView service is probably the closest match for Microsoft’s console and home entertainment plans. However the wording was chosen carefully as it reflects just the “current” situation. Also Microsoft has confirmed that live TV functionality will be limited to the US at launch time but it was “anticipating global scale over time.”

Xbox One reveal precipitates Wii U sales boost?

Another interesting snippet today is revealed by games industry trade mag MCVUK. Apparently sales of the Wii U on Amazon.co.uk have skyrocketed following Microsoft’s next gen announcement. The result is that the Wii U Premium pack has shifted from 243rd in Amazon’s retail ‘Movers and Shakers’ list to 50th place. It is reported that sales have increased 386 per cent, albeit from a low starting point.



HEXUS Forums :: 23 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Hmm, lucid looked at some similar technology to this in some ways, but it seems complicated. If you can accept lower latency then why not just increase the time available to render and update that part of the scene at a lower frame rate, while still on the local computer?
I'm really, really, really unsure about this. First off it strikes me as unnecessarily complex. Secondly if you've decided to operate your XBO in “offline” mode as much as possible (probably because you've got a tight-fisted ISP) then you obviously aren't going to benefit from this. Then there's the small matter of latency, where I would have thought that any hiccups in delivery are going to be very noticeable.

Being overly critical it would seem to me that this is a feature announced merely because they canooo come lookee at our cool cloud compute thing

Unless this is MS admitting that the just-launched XBO can't cut it against the PS4? :o
Yeeeeah, bit sceptical. OTOH I was impressed that Onlive existed (and worked) at all; pre-launch it just sounded implausible to me…

MS might have something or it might not but at least they're thinking ‘outside the Box’.

{Sorry!} :mrgreen:
I wonder what the minimal level of internet connection required is??
CAT-THE-FIFTH
I wonder what the minimal level of internet connection required is??

Probably more than most people have access too.
In anycase, this is going to be a MASSIVE badwidth hog and if you use this, you can't do anything else on your internet as it will be suck it dry.