facebook rss twitter

NVIDIA G84 & G86 Prepare to Land in April?

by Navin Maini on 2 March 2007, 19:46

Tags: NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qahzw

Add to My Vault: x

The Inquirer enlightens us today about the soon to be born G84 and G86 parts from NVIDIA.

Both mainstream derivatives of NVIDIA's G80 technology, the G86, of which the fastest variant is due to be known as the GeForce 8600GTS is expected at a price point of $50 to $100 less than NVIDIA's current GeForce 8800GTS 320MB solution and is due to clocked at 700MHz for the GPU and 1GHz for the memory, yielding available bandwidth of 32GB/s.

The solution is expected to require the power deliverable by one 6-pin PCIe connector and the G84 chip itself features 64 scalar shaders and is built on an 80nm TSMC process.

With a rumoured price point of under $180, the G84 based GeForce 8600GT, one notch down from the above mentioned GTS solution, will apparently feature a GPU clock speed of 600MHz and 1400MHz effective memory speed.

Both solutions will support either memory configurations of 256MB or 512MB of GDDR3 memory.

Another release, being the 8500 series, will supposedly feature a G84 GPU containing 48 scalar shaders, clearly cut down further from the 64 scalar shaders in the 8600 series and the 128 scalar shaders in the 8800 series.

The 8500 series will apparently feature passive cooling, replace the price point formerly occupied by the 7300GT and be endowed with a GPU clock speed of 450MHz and memory speeds of 800MHz.

Moving on, G86 will be born in the form of the GeForce 8300, which replacing the GeForce 7300GS, is expected at the end of the second quarter.

The suggested launch date for the G84 based solutions is apparently in mid-April, totally avoiding CeBIT, yet perhaps the recent delay to AMD's R600 has bought some further polishing time for NVIDIA and they can make their move on their own terms.

Regardless of politics though, to have high-end and mainstream DirectX 10 parts available before the competition has launched any DirectX 10 parts of their own is something which NVIDIA is undoubtedly proud of, especially since the story was somewhat different when DirectX 9 emerged.

The suggested launch date is apparently when the playable demo of a certain DirectX 10 title is due to be available. I can't think what it could be though...

HEXUS.links

HEXUS.community :: Voice your opinion.


HEXUS Forums :: 5 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Not that I have a vested interest in this but AMD better release something spectacular or they're dead in the water. nVidia are going to have the market locked off before AMD can even begin to sell parts. ATi workers must be pretty bummed that AMD brought their bad mojo with them.
I wouldnt quite say that the ATI part of AMD is going to turn into 3dfx just yet ;)
If their next product they comes out with is fairly solid, they should be ok, although at the rate the market moves they really do need to release somthing soon.

The 8800 series is a solid though. Perhaps AMD had issues they couldnt overcome? - A bad product can be worse than no product somtimes!
I hope they bring out the r600 series next month or Nvidia are going to have another customer for the 8800 series. :D
Agent is bang on the money……ATI would be much better off releasing nothing, rather then releasing the new Voodoo 6 ;)

Although it really is starting to look like the AMD/ATI merger was either ill-conceived or its taken them a while to get the new operation into full-swing…..and seeing as they themselves are mostly responsible for the AMD/ATI and Intel/nVidia divide, you would think they would have pulled out the stops to swing people to their products.

At the moment it seems that the Intel/nVidia route is a no-brainier for anyone who wants performance. AMD/ATI is almost a bargain-bin brand, they really need a big win and soon.
AMD have more or less skipped a manufacturing step though - they hit 80nm chips before Nvidia with the X1950pro and x1650 and rather than dwell on it they've gone straight to 65nm. That and the merger have hurt them in the top end market prestige, but they don't care about that so much - it's the low range chips that bring in most of the money and how much they bring in is more about manufacturing costs than anything else.

If OEMs can buy AMD chips cheaper than NVidia chips, those will sell more.