facebook rss twitter

Crucial FBDIMMs aim for faster servers

by Steve Kerrison on 24 May 2006, 20:31

Tags: Crucial Technology (NASDAQ:MU)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaftd

Add to My Vault: x

Crucial

Following our news piece yesterday about new servers supporting fully buffered DIMMs, it would be prudent of us to mention Crucial's FBDIMM modules, released this month.

A problem with memory, that exists not just for servers, but for workstations and desktops too, is that there are (unsurprisingly) drawback to the two progressions we all seek. Making memory faster can lead to more errors, as interconnects are pushed to their limits. Making memory denser can lead to the need to reduce their speed. Neither situation is ideal, so naturally DRAM, DIMM, motherboard and chip manufacturers are always looking at ways to improve the situation.

The latest (and greatest?) solution, currently making its way into servers, is the FBDIMM. To quote Crucial's white paper on FBDIMMs:

FBDIMMs feature an advanced memory buffer (AMB) that buffers the DRAM data pins from the channel and uses high-speed point-to-point lines (serial signaling similar to PCI Express) to eliminate the stub bus.

Basically, the serial nature of the connection means more DIMMs can be hung off a memory controller and they can be run faster. The end result is more memory capacity and upgradeability, along with better throughput. Along with that, FBDIMMS feature a number of error checking and handling techniques that reduce the likelihood of errors, without killing performance; great news for servers.

Crucial's FBDIMMs range from 512MiB to 4GiB in density, at speeds of 533MHz or 667MHz. Find a table of them over at Crucial.com.

FBDIMM sounds great on paper, so it'll be interesting to see how well it works in Intel servers, compared to AMD-based rigs, for which FBDIMM seems to be a way off yet.



HEXUS Forums :: 5 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
This is pretty specialist technology but interesting never the less..
Does it strike anyone else as odd that as far as memory (permenant or otherwise) is concerned going serial seems to be the next thing, but as far as everything else (cpu/gpu) is concerned, they're going parallel?
David
This is pretty specialist technology but interesting never the less..

our dell vendors implied it was gonna be mandatory in xeon servers soonish - and that the FB chip consumes a LOT of extra power (~10W per stick)
kalniel
Does it strike anyone else as odd that as far as memory (permenant or otherwise) is concerned going serial seems to be the next thing, but as far as everything else (cpu/gpu) is concerned, they're going parallel?
exactly my thought!

i mean it might be cheaper for making motherboards, but surely it means RAM is going to be more complex, hence the power increase. Now i can understand how you could buffer things too improve channel entropy, but surely you could do that better in parrallel (granted it might cost more).
this sounds alot like RAMBUS, and we know where that went….

and the problem with parallel is keeping the bits in sync, thats why sata is faster than pata, SCSI is parallel, but thats why the cables can cost £50!

parallel should technically be faster, but there comes a point where the bits can no longer remain in sync at such high data rates.