facebook rss twitter

Intel 'Emcrest' SSDs with 450MB/s read speeds to land next month?

by Pete Mason on 28 January 2011, 16:47

Tags: Intel (NASDAQ:INTC)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qa4a7

Add to My Vault: x

The rumour mill has been pretty quiet on Intel's third-gen SSDs since we caught wind of some supposed specs in October last year. Although the drives are still due out this quarter, the latest buzz suggests that they might actually be something to get excited about.

According to Fudzilla's network of unnamed sources, the next-gen SSDs will be a part of the Emcrest-family and built using Intel's brand new 34nm NAND. Although this is a step backwards from the 25nm memory that was rumoured previously, it does seem a little bit more realistic.

But it's the performance numbers that are really interesting. The source suggests that read speeds could be on the order of 450MB/s, while writes would be able to hit 300MB/s. For comparison, Intel's current generation drives - even the high performance X25-E series - only managed to hit 250MB/s and 170MB/s. Random read performance is suspected to be around 20,000 4k IOPS.

While the random read performance is quite a bit slower than current-gen SandForce-based drives, the sequential speeds are significantly better. They even get close to the next-gen SF-2000 controller's 550MB/s read and 525MB/s write performance, although that isn't expected to arrive in consumer devices until later this year.

Obviously these sorts of numbers would require SATA 6GBps, which Intel has supported with this new controller.

The only real red flag for us is that the source says that they will launch under the '510' branding. Currently, the company's mini-PCIe SSDs are branded as 310, so it's possible that these either aren't traditional 2.5in drives, or we're seeing a new marketing strategy.

Apparently the drives will launch in 250GB and 120GB models priced at $579 and $279 (£450 and £215 inc VAT) respectively. Although this is pretty pricey, it's roughly in-line with current high-end consumer drives at these capacities.

These numbers might sound a bit fanciful at the moment, but we should only have to wait a few more weeks to find out if there's any truth to them at all.



HEXUS Forums :: 10 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Im not sure if im happy or a bit dissapointed… 60-80gb is fine for me and im looking for a new SSD but was waiting for the new intel/sandforce and micron drives, if any of them went for £1/gb then id buy it right now. Intels 25nm drives were being said to double the capacity and increase the speeds modestly without affecting price… so that would have meant they were under 1/gb or darn close. I dont want huge burst speeds i just want the SSD advantages like the minimal access time, 150mb/s+ is good enough… maybe ill just have to look at the alternatives if these are going for the high end pricing :P.
Hopefully older models will drop in price? I don't care for higher throughput or anything else actually, personally I think the Intel SSDs have reached a certain sufficient performance level and now we (I) just need higher capacity for cheaper.

That or Steam needs to have a facility that I can offload certain games to other physical HDDs :/

My old Samsung SSDs pale in comparison to current SSDs but even then there is a large noticeable difference after moving them to either my 640GB WD blue or Samsung F1 1TB (texture/world loading, map loading, reduced stutters etc…)
LuckyNV
That or Steam needs to have a facility that I can offload certain games to other physical HDDs :/

Well you're right in that you can't choose and pick ‘certain’ games to be offloaded to other physical HDDs but you can choose for *all* of them to be quite easily. All my steam games are on a separate raptor drive - I would love them to be on my main system SSD but like most people couldn't afford one big enough… (but no biggie if they take a little bit longer to load from a mechanical drive - my game playing time ain't *that* precious)
LuckyNV
That or Steam needs to have a facility that I can offload certain games to other physical HDDs :/


If I need space for a new game on my SSD, I backup the games I want to the HDD. If I need a game again it can be restored in matter of minutes with all the saves.
Main question is the price.

I already have a 150GB WD VelociRaptor as my main HDD and considering going SSD now.

I don't play too many games. so even with Win7 and my necessary apps; I still got COD MW2, Black OPS, Battlefield BC2, StarCarft 2, NFS Hot Pursuit and Combat Arms in it with 30 GB remaining.

I paid £105 for my VelociRaptor. If the Intel had the drive at £190 for 150 GB which for me seem to be the sweet spot I'm sold.