facebook rss twitter

OCZ introduces sub-£75 Onyx SSD

by Parm Mann on 12 March 2010, 09:55

Tags: OCZ (NASDAQ:OCZ)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qawky

Add to My Vault: x

OCZ just can't seem to stop its relentless launch of new solid-state drives (SSDs). Earlier this week, the company introduced its latest offering in the form of the Onyx Series, a supposedly "cost-efficient SSD" that OCZ hopes will become a viable alternative to your traditional hard drive.

The 2.5in Onyx SSD, pictured above, makes use of Multi-Level Cell (MLC) Flash memory and a 64MB onboard cache to deliver read and write speeds of up to 125MB/s and 70MB/s, respectively.

There's no mention of any specific controller, but it's far from the quickest SSD we've ever seen, and it's almost one of the smallest in capacity offering just 32GB of storage. However, considering OCZ's target market of users in need of a boot drive for "mobile PCs and netbooks", the Onyx SSD might fit the bill should performance matter more than capacity.

Aiming at the bottom end of the SSD market, OCZ needs to beat its existing Solid 2 line of value-orientated SSDs in terms of price, and does so comfortably. We're told to expect the drive at US retail priced under the $100 mark, and we're already seeing it appear at UK stores priced at around £75.

That, by our reckoning, makes this one of the cheapest 32GB SSDs currently on the market.



HEXUS Forums :: 27 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Very useful to putting some zing back into an slightly older notebook… shame there is no 64GB option for < £130… or is there?
Well, at £75 it may be the cheapest, but at £75 for 32GB compared to about £90-£95 for the Intel 40GB Gen 2, it's not looking like a steal to me. Were I in the market for one, I think I'd go Intel over this. The OCZ may be a bit cheaper, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's good value for money. It looks more like false economy to me.
Not cheapest by a whole lot when you look at the 30Gb Agility drive which costs about £10 more…
Saracen
Well, at £75 it may be the cheapest, but at £75 for 32GB compared to about £90-£95 for the Intel 40GB Gen 2, it's not looking like a steal to me. Were I in the market for one, I think I'd go Intel over this. The OCZ may be a bit cheaper, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's good value for money. It looks more like false economy to me.

I agree. The price/GB of any of the value SSDs never seems to be below that of the far superior Intel drives. When dealing with such small drives I think the extra 8gb of the Intel equivalent makes a big difference too.

I still think the 80gb Intel gives the best cost/performance/capacity mix.
Not that simple - we need benchmarks to establish it's 4k read/write/random capabilities in order to compare it properly. The intel's likely to win out on this though given it's track record but the OCZ in an unknown quantity. It's a shame the kingston 40gb drives were stopped - they were a bargain for sure (I have two) and as it turned out, rebadged intel drives. 30gb-40gb is ideal as a boot drive - my media center only uses 20gb of that anyway.