facebook rss twitter

Corsair explains: why quality coolers are essential for Core i7 PCs using performance DDR3 memory

by Parm Mann on 12 August 2009, 10:46

Tags: Corsair Hydro H50, Corsair

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qatib

Add to My Vault: x

We tend not to enjoy marketing spin from most manufacturers, but that's not generally the case with Corsair. The high-end manufacturer of performance PC components tends to back up its marketing with real-world figures obtained via thorough testing.

Hoping to get a little more ammunition, the Fremont, California-based outfit has decided to test whether or not the use of high-end DDR3 memory on an Intel Core i7 platform has an adverse effect on cooling and temperatures. Corsair's results, as expected, have found that high-performance DDR3 requires a Core i7 processor's integrated memory controller to run at higher speeds with increased voltages.

Exactly how much of a knock-on effect does it have? Well, Corsair's figures claim that moving from 1,333MHz DDR3 to 2,000MHz DDR3 on a Core i7 platform can result in an 11°C increase in CPU temperature. Here are the figures for varying memory speeds:

Corsair reckons that Intel's stock cooler is unable to cope with a Core i7 PC sporting DDR3 memory running at 1,866MHz of above. The answer, we're told, is to use a better-performing cooling solution - and Corsair's recommendation is of course its own Hydro H50.

It's an interesting little analysis, and if you want to read up on Corsair's entire test, check out the eight-page PDF at Corsair.com.

Want to know what we think about the Hydro H50 cooler? Check out our in-depth review.



HEXUS Forums :: 6 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
This is an interesting point I hadn't previosuly considered. On a quick glance the 8-page pdf is actually fairly scant in detail, ill check it over again later.

Were the test conditions such that the CPU frequency remained constant but the memory speed was increased and therefore the VTT was increased to cope with this? This increase in VTT/memoery frequency caused a large increase in power consumption so the tmeperature increased.

If this is the case, then my initial thought would be not to run such fast ram. Having been out of the loop for a while I will need to look up some information. In the past, however, I have found that CPU frequency was far more important than ram speed in terms of performance. of course the cpu based memory controller may change this.
Scarlet Infidel;1752892
If this is the case, then my initial thought would be not to run such fast ram. Having been out of the loop for a while I will need to look up some information. In the past, however, I have found that CPU frequency was far more important than ram speed in terms of performance. of course the cpu based memory controller may change this.

Actually you're even more correct - the triple channel bandwidth to RAM for the i7 is so fat that RAM speed is never a bottleneck, so it's definitely better to concentrate on CPU frequency only as increasing RAM speed hardly makes a difference.
So running RAM faster than you need to is going to increase temperatures without increasing performance. This in turn will reduce the maximum CPU overclock which is fundamental for performance.

Seems like a good advert of why not to buy fast ram from Corsair or similar.
I'm betting Kalniel and especially Scarlet Infidel aren't on Corsair's xmas card list anymore :mrgreen:
GaryRW
I'm betting Kalniel and especially Scarlet Infidel aren't on Corsair's xmas card list anymore :mrgreen:

I can live with that, as long as I get a birthday card.