facebook rss twitter

OCZ launches supposedly-affordable Agility line of SSDs

by Parm Mann on 9 June 2009, 16:23

Tags: OCZ (NASDAQ:OCZ)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qasli

Add to My Vault: x

Solid state drives promise all sorts of performance goodness, and though we'd all love to get our hands on one, their pricing is such that they're still out of reach for the majority.

Speaking to OCZ at last week's COMPUTEX, we were introduced to the Colossus SSD, a 1TB monster claiming read and write speeds of up to 265MB/s. Undoubtedly impressive, but in the knowledge that it's outrageously pricey, our question to OCZ was this: "your solid-state solutions continue to get bigger and quicker, but what about something that's smaller, cheaper, stutter free and equipped with decent performance?"

If you've been asking the same question, here's your answer. It's called the OCZ Agility Series, and it promises to provide the "performance and reliability of SSDs at less price per gigabyte than other high speed offerings currently on the market".

The Agility Series will be available in 30GB, 60GB and 120GB capacities - all ample for a system drive, we reckon - and comes equipped with a 64MB onboard cache. OCZ's using an Indilinx controller that should provide stutter-free operation, and it claims to have lowered the cost of the drives by using cheaper NAND flash memory.

Unfortunately for performance fiends, the use of cheaper flash memory will have a knock on effect on read and write speeds. OCZ lists the maximum performance of each Agility Series drive as follows:

30GB (part number OCZSSD2-1AGT30G) - read speed up to 185MB/s, write speed up to 100MB/s
60GB (part number OCZSSD2-1AGT60G) - read speed up to 230MB/s, write speed up to 135MB/s
100GB (part number OCZSSD2-1AGT30G) - read speed up to 230MB/s, write speed up to 135MB/s

Not the quickest we've ever seen, of course, but still potent enough. The all-important factor will be pricing, and though OCZ's yet to mention any figures, the 60GB drive could well be a promising solution if the price is right.

We'll bring you pricing information as soon as we have it, in the meantime, how much would you be willing to pay for a decent mainstream SSD? Share your thoughts in the HEXUS.community forums.



HEXUS Forums :: 24 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
I think aslong as they're quieter and the same speed as a HDD, then I'd be willing to pay a bit more for the silence/rigidity of them. Other than that, don't see the point of paying a premium for the bragging of having ‘slow’ SSD drive.
The R/W for the 30GB is better than a lot of solutions out there under the budget range. At least they're not using a JMicron controller :)

The cheapest SSDs are going for just under 2GBP per GB. So the 30GB model for 55-70 squids?
if they were that price i think i would go for one :)
I recon I would start seriously consider buying a SSD at around the £100 mark for 60/64GB, thats assuming it was quick and reliable. Yes i could run a lot less for system drive, but I would also be thinking of having any games i wanted to play installed on that drive for the lightening quick level loads, so 60GB is really the minimum size I would go for.

Hopefully SSDs of that size or greater will be going for less than £100 by xmas, if not i am fairly sure they will be by this time next year.
Keep an eye out on the Kingston then, at £105 for 64GB it's not to be sniffed at. But we're still waiting on cache/controller, don't know how good it is yet. And the Corsair is good, despite slower read/write speeds.

What everyone here seems to be missing (including the author, Parm) is that once read/write speeds pass a certain point with SSDs (a little slower than mechanical HDD sequential read/writes), for most applications there will be no performance loss when compared to SSDs with faster read/writes. It's the access times and IOPS that make SSDs so much faster than HDDs; the only time very fast transfer rates are needed is when handling huge files (and, to a small extent, loading large game files into RAM). Loading lots of small files, such as when booting Windows or loading most applications, will show a huge difference between mechanical HDDs and almost any SSD, but the difference between say the Corsair 128GB (£170) and the 120GB Vertex (£340) is small. The IOPS is what counts, and both these SSDs have very high IOPS.

Yes you get slightly more performance from the Vertex compared to the Corsair, but nowhere near as much as you'd expect just by looking at transfer speeds, and certainly not £170 worth.