facebook rss twitter

AMD's CEO slams Intel for lack of innovation and monopolistic behaviour. Go, Hector, go!

by Tarinder Sandhu on 3 December 2007, 09:17

Tags: AMD (NYSE:AMD)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qakkz

Add to My Vault: x



In the face of an ever-falling stock price that has dropped to its lowest levels in four years and lost 75 per cent in under two; a lukewarm reception - to put it very mildly - to its quad-core Phenom X4 processor; and recent predictions that it will drop out of the world's top 10 chip makers; Dr. Hector Ruiz, AMD CEO, came out with some fighting talk this last weekend.

Avuncular-looking Ruiz cited the company's recent decline on a number of factors. The most interesting, however, was the blame he put at Intel's door. Quoting him from a Gulf News article, Ruiz commented "If you look at the last five years, if you look at what major innovations have occurred in computing technology, every single one of them came from AMD. Not a single innovation came from Intel".

Wow, wee! Don't hold back there, Hector: you're living up to your name!

Dear, Doctor, we have news for you, though. Put these words in no particular order: 45nm process; quad-core CPUs; high-k metal gate; Centrino; PCI-Express; and USB3.0. Perhaps they've been expunged from the AMD dictionary? You tell us.

Ruiz further opined that "So I would say that Intel is trying to catch up with us in that respect" and loaded the verbal shotgun with this magnificent literary gem "Intel continues... to abuse their monopoly and that's why around the world governments and regulatory agencies continue to go after them."

We reckon that AMD has sound technology and needs to ride out the next 18 months or so, to steady the good ship, and then re-think its strategy. It needs to raise the average selling price for its desktop processors, currently hampered by Intel's aggressive across-the-board pricing, and then, somehow, claim technology leadership with the much-awaited Bulldozer core.

Let's hope the recent cash injection from the Abu Dhabi outfit can keep AMD ticking along and, more importantly, give the consumer real, honest-to-goodness choice for their CPUs, motherboards and graphics cards.

Source: Gulf News.


HEXUS Forums :: 28 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
The fact is that at the moment, AMD's line is having its dinner money beaten out of it in both absolute performance and price/performance by Intel. There's no doubt that a lot of what he says about abuse of monopolistic power by Intel's been true, but that's an argument that only stands a chance of winning you friends if you can demonstrate that you have an equivalent or superior product that's being strangled. At the moment, AMD can't - no-one regrets that more than I do (well, maybe Hector does…) but that's the way it is.
nichomach
The fact is that at the moment, AMD's line is having its dinner money beaten out of it in both absolute performance and price/performance by Intel. There's no doubt that a lot of what he says about abuse of monopolistic power by Intel's been true, but that's an argument that only stands a chance of winning you friends if you can demonstrate that you have an equivalent or superior product that's being strangled. At the moment, AMD can't - no-one regrets that more than I do (well, maybe Hector does…) but that's the way it is.

very well worded. I'd LOVE to love an AMD again. But right now…I can't :(

And more scary…my Radeon will prolly become an nVidia next change :(
Regardless of how callously we try to view the market, I think a lot of us are rather keen on the idea of “The Little Processor Company That Could”; but they're not doing themselves any favours. Look at how they've (essentially) ****ed any adopters of Quad FX - that's the sort of thing we're used to ripping Intel about. On the graphics front, the 2900 was underwhelming at best, and the 38XX series are having to compete by being a lot cheaper to offset their relative performance disadvantage. Not good; it's a losing game - Intel can always make cheaper versions of stuff that they have a performance lead with, as can nVidia; but you have to have that performance lead there to start with.
For a long time any pc I built (whether for friend/family, or for profit) was amd, simply because they were the best for price/performance and left intel in the dust.

Around 18 months ago, intel release c2d at a reasonable price, plus (they stole amds crown here) very overclockable, and I could no longer recommend amd chips, this doesn't mean amd chips aren't good, just not good enough.

My last 5 pcs have been amd, soon it'll be time to upgrade, unfortunetly I have an 939 mobo so rather than just put another amd chip in it, I have to upgrade the mobo too. So now I have a choice, and amd looses.

I really hope that in the (near) future amd can come back to what it was, we need the competition to keep the marketplace fresh.

This will take innovation and good ideas, not temper tantrum style rants to the media.
Hardly a professional responce there tbh from Mr Hector..

we all know its swings and roundabouts in the PC world but think he's taking the piss abit there…

He also missed out how Intel slate stuff like socket CPU's, when Intel went to slot they said the socket was dead etc etc, then they swapped back.
Intel slated AMD's naming convention, then they went all arse to cock with there's too..