facebook rss twitter

European ACTA piracy treaty looks likely to be rejected

by Alistair Lowe on 22 June 2012, 10:50

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qabin5

Add to My Vault: x

ACTA, the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, is an attempt at extending a common copyright and intellectual property law across the world. Currently the agreement is a hot topic in Europe, where it had been negotiated behind closed doors until a leak brought the matter into the public domain.

The treaty is well known for its harsh wording, favouring almost entirely, at least in its earlier revisions, the content industry. Since then it has been watered down somewhat, however, still looks to criminalise most forms of copyright infringement, including aiding and abetting and DRM circumvention and looks to minimise the voice of consumers.

ACTA has taken a bit of a beating lately, however. Towards the start of it all, the EU's chief Investigator, Kader Arif, resigned in protest to the number of states that had signed the agreement despite his recommendations; even newly appointed British chief investigator, David Martin, has recommended against the treaty, stating "The intended benefits of this international greement are far outweighed by the potencial threats to civil liberties."

Alone, the protests of a few investigators and minor committees have little weight, however, most recently, the influential European trade committee voted to reject ACTA by 19 votes to 12, potentially placing a very large nail into the coffin of ACTA, as this committee provides the formal recommendation of how the wider parliament should vote, something which is scheduled to take place next month.



HEXUS Forums :: 4 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Its quite shocking how many +1 votes this actually received. I wonder how many more sopaactapipa bool$hit they'll try before they give up…Big finger to ya!!
They will ether slip through something similar without anyone noticing or go back to the tried and tested, Piracy funds terrorism / harms children line.
Eventually I can see things moving towards a, this is law now, tough **** stance, there getting more and more open with the shady things they do and for the most part most people are just meh about it.
Platinum
They will ether slip through something similar without anyone noticing or go back to the tried and tested, Piracy funds terrorism / harms children line.
Eventually I can see things moving towards a, this is law now, tough **** stance, there getting more and more open with the shady things they do and for the most part most people are just meh about it.

Yes exactly, seems any controversial or restrictive law they want passed gets this treatment.

It would be nice to have a system based on realistic enforcement and fairness for all rather than one which appears to favour only the greed of the makers/distributors and the pockets of their lawyers/politicians to enforce it.

Wait, arent politicians supposed to act for the people?
rabbid
Wait, arent politicians supposed to act for the people?
Representatives seem to only have been concerned with representing their financiers/friends for the last few decades.