facebook rss twitter

The Obama Administration comments on SOPA

by Alistair Lowe on 16 January 2012, 11:01

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qabbe5

Add to My Vault: x

COMBATING ONLINE PIRACY WHILE PROTECTING AN OPEN AND INNOVATIVE INTERNET

By Victoria Espinel, Aneesh Chopra, and Howard Schmidt
 
Thanks for taking the time to sign this petition. Both your words and actions illustrate the importance of maintaining an open and democratic Internet.
 
Right now, Congress is debating a few pieces of legislation concerning the very real issue of online piracy, including the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), the PROTECT IP Act, and the Online Protection and Digital ENforcement Act (OPEN). We want to take this opportunity to tell you what the Administration will support—and what we will not support. Any effective legislation should reflect a wide range of stakeholders, including everyone from content creators to the engineers that build and maintain the infrastructure of the Internet.
 
While we believe that online piracy by foreign websites is a serious problem that requires a serious legislative response, we will not support legislation that reduces freedom of expression, increases cybersecurity risk, or undermines the dynamic, innovative global Internet.
 
Any effort to combat online piracy must guard against the risk of online censorship of lawful activity and must not inhibit innovation by our dynamic businesses large and small. Across the globe, the openness of the Internet is increasingly central to innovation in business, government, and society and it must be protected. To minimize this risk, new legislation must be narrowly targeted only at sites beyond the reach of current U.S. law, cover activity clearly prohibited under existing U.S. laws, and be effectively tailored, with strong due process and focused on criminal activity. Any provision covering Internet intermediaries such as online advertising networks, payment processors, or search engines must be transparent and designed to prevent overly broad private rights of action that could encourage unjustified litigation that could discourage startup businesses and innovative firms from growing.
 
We must avoid creating new cybersecurity risks or disrupting the underlying architecture of the Internet. Proposed laws must not tamper with the technical architecture of the Internet through manipulation of the Domain Name System (DNS), a foundation of Internet security. Our analysis of the DNS filtering provisions in some proposed legislation suggests that they pose a real risk to cybersecurity and yet leave contraband goods and services accessible online. We must avoid legislation that drives users to dangerous, unreliable DNS servers and puts next-generation security policies, such as the deployment of DNSSEC, at risk.
 
Let us be clear—online piracy is a real problem that harms the American economy, threatens jobs for significant numbers of middle class workers and hurts some of our nation's most creative and innovative companies and entrepreneurs.  It harms everyone from struggling artists to production crews, and from startup social media companies to large movie studios. While we are strongly committed to the vigorous enforcement of intellectual property rights, existing tools are not strong enough to root out the worst online pirates beyond our borders. That is why the Administration calls on all sides to work together to pass sound legislation this year that provides prosecutors and rights holders new legal tools to combat online piracy originating beyond U.S. borders while staying true to the principles outlined above in this response.  We should never let criminals hide behind a hollow embrace of legitimate American values.
 
This is not just a matter for legislation. We expect and encourage all private parties, including both content creators and Internet platform providers working together, to adopt voluntary measures and best practices to reduce online piracy.
 
So, rather than just look at how legislation can be stopped, ask yourself: Where do we go from here? Don’t limit your opinion to what’s the wrong thing to do, ask yourself what’s right. Already, many members of Congress are asking for public input around the issue. We are paying close attention to those opportunities, as well as to public input to the Administration. The organizer of this petition and a random sample of the signers will be invited to a conference call to discuss this issue further with Administration officials and soon after that, we will host an online event to get more input and answer your questions. Details on that will follow in the coming days.
 
Washington needs to hear your best ideas about how to clamp down on rogue websites and other criminals who make money off the creative efforts of American artists and rights holders. We should all be committed to working with all interested constituencies to develop new legal tools to protect global intellectual property rights without jeopardizing the openness of the Internet. Our hope is that you will bring enthusiasm and know-how to this important challenge.
 
Moving forward, we will continue to work with Congress on a bipartisan basis on legislation that provides new tools needed in the global fight against piracy and counterfeiting, while vigorously defending an open Internet based on the values of free expression, privacy, security and innovation. Again, thank you for taking the time to participate in this important process. We hope you’ll continue to be part of it.
 
Victoria Espinel is Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator at Office of Management and Budget
 
Aneesh Chopra is the U.S. Chief Technology Officer and Assistant to the President and Associate Director for Technology at the Office of Science and Technology Policy
 
Howard Schmidt is Special Assistant to the President and Cybersecurity Coordinator for National Security Staff



HEXUS Forums :: 9 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
In the words of Tythus, “Hell, Its about time”
Mr Murdoch also lashed out at Google, “Piracy leader is Google who streams movies free, sells advts around them. No wonder pouring millions into lobbying.” A rich sentiment, coming from a man who's own subsidiary firm, News of the World, often broke the law, committing acts of phone hacking as it saw fit.
+1 on this. :thumbsup:

As far as I can tell* a summary of SOPA seems to be to censor(/block?) everything unless you can prove that you shouldn't be. On the other hand Google's rebuttal to the comment above is that they'd be happy to censor/block stuff that's shown to require it

(* and I'm quite content to be told I've picked them up wrong)

If I've got this correct then I'd go with Google's approach as technically better, if not also more in line with the principal of being “innocent until proved guilty”. I also have doubts that it's necessarily about protecting intellectual property and more about suppressing unfriendly information and opinions - but then again, maybe I'm getting paranoid in my old age…? :secret: Maybe the Obama govt's time would better be spent in arranging some kind of reciprocal/speeded-up legal arrangement with the main internet players - e.g. so warez sites identified by the US could be blocked by all ISP's in US, EU, China, MEA, in one fell swoop?
crossy
+1 on this. :thumbsup:

As far as I can tell* a summary of SOPA seems to be to censor(/block?) everything unless you can prove that you shouldn't be. On the other hand Google's rebuttal to the comment above is that they'd be happy to censor/block stuff that's shown to require it

(* and I'm quite content to be told I've picked them up wrong)
Nope, you're quite right, it also removes the requirement of due process, as it cuts the courts out of the picture entirely. In other-words, the content corps are after court-level powers which they can execute on an arbitrary whim. And we've already seen where that gets us by Youtube and the like giving them the delete button to arbitrary content.

crossy
If I've got this correct then I'd go with Google's approach as technically better, if not also more in line with the principal of being “innocent until proved guilty”. I also have doubts that it's necessarily about protecting intellectual property and more about suppressing unfriendly information and opinions - but then again, maybe I'm getting paranoid in my old age…? :secret: Maybe the Obama govt's time would better be spent in arranging some kind of reciprocal/speeded-up legal arrangement with the main internet players - e.g. so warez sites identified by the US could be blocked by all ISP's in US, EU, China, MEA, in one fell swoop?
Blocking doesn't do anything. More sites pop up every day, technical countermeasures pop up every day, this is all a complete waste of tax payers money for the benefit of power mad big content corporations.

SOPA and Protect IP should just be taken out the back and shot. DMCA revoked, shorten the period to 50 years, that's plenty, and leave it to the courts to go through copyright claims as is proper procedure.
Rupert Murdoch
No wonder pouring millions into lobbying.

Pot / Kettle? Or is he just complaining that Google can spend millions on it whereas he has to do it on the cheap by just having meetings with politicians? a very quick google came up with “Revealed: Cameron's 26 meetings in 15 months with Murdoch chiefs”, Alex Salmond had 25 with members of News International in 4 years, that Tony Blair is godfather to Rupert Murdoch’s daughter, etc…

As for SOPA itself, there is already lots of evidence that the big content companies can't be trusted - the one that springs to mind is Warner Bros issuing automated DMCA take-down notices for anything and everything with “the box” in the description (http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/11/warner-admits-it-issues-takedowns-for-files-it-hasnt-looked-at.ars)
GaryRW
Pot / Kettle? Or is he just complaining that Google can spend millions on it whereas he has to do it on the cheap by just having meetings with politicians? a very quick google came up with “Revealed: Cameron's 26 meetings in 15 months with Murdoch chiefs”, Alex Salmond had 25 with members of News International in 4 years, that Tony Blair is godfather to Rupert Murdoch’s daughter, etc…

As for SOPA itself, there is already lots of evidence that the big content companies can't be trusted - the one that springs to mind is Warner Bros issuing automated DMCA take-down notices for anything and everything with “the box” in the description (http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/11/warner-admits-it-issues-takedowns-for-files-it-hasnt-looked-at.ars)
Hmm, maybe the Adam Smith Institute (or similar) could do a learned study on the Return on Investment of “back door” lobbying such as RM does, versus the more overt kind. ;)

Love that Arstechnica article - I was ROFL. Good point made though, if the studios (and it would appear that they are the sole beneficiary of SOPA) are heavy handedly abusing their current powers (and I notice that ArsTechnica also fingers Universal for similar stupidity) then only a complete psychotic would willingly give them more control! :wallbash:

Don't you just love the way that a few unaccountable corporations in the US can exercise so much global power…?
:stupid: