facebook rss twitter

Microsoft to offer non-US storage for non-US users?

by Mark Tyson on 23 January 2014, 10:09

Tags: Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qab7xn

Add to My Vault: x

Microsoft's general counsel Brad Smith has said that Microsoft will allow foreign customers to make use of its cloud servers outside the US - in a response the US government data snooping scandal. The move has been deemed necessary by Microsoft "although many tech companies were opposed to the idea," reports the FT. The reasoning is that leaks have shown the US National Security Agency (NSA) has been sifting through data of foreign citizens and not just US residents. This is something even close US allies aren't happy about.

"People should have the ability to know whether their data are being subjected to the laws and access of governments in some other country and should have the ability to make an informed choice of where their data resides," Brad Smith told the FT. This move would make Microsoft the first major company to explicitly offer non-US storage. Smith gave an example of how the system would work saying that European users would be able to choose to utilise Microsoft's Irish data centres for storage.

Microsoft's idea has been welcomed by data privacy campaigners but the big question is if such offshore data is really more private and out of reach of US government snoopers. It was pointed out by the FT that US Tech companies can still be forced by their government to hand over user data, wherever it may be held.

Smith did not mention any concrete plans about the implementation of this offshore data idea. However he did say that if Microsoft ignored what its customers wanted, by not making their company and personal data as private as possible, then "That’s not a smart business strategy". This is especially true with the current mistrust of US tech companies evident in Europe and China.

Office Web Apps get updated

In related news Microsoft has just updated its web apps with a new flatter look and other tweaks to the interfaces. TechCrunch reports that the new look makes all the apps more similar in design to the Outlook.com email portal. Easier navigation and spacing improvements are said to make touch-operation easier too.



HEXUS Forums :: 16 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
They are still Microsoft servers, on the compromised Microsoft network….regardless of geo-location.

Will this storage really be any more secure or less susceptible to US government snooping? I doubt it.
…and we know that Microsoft, as a US company, is likely to comply with requests from the US government or suffer at home. Would it really do that to protect 3rd party privacy? Until the EU or similar actually puts some (serious) teeth into the threats of data sharing without permission, it is easier for a US company to comply with the request and worry about the fine later. Superficially it looks like a very similar problem to foreign IT companies operating in China (e.g. Google - you're expected to behave like a US company or gather all the bad publicity for working with the Chinese government, but can't operate there without following the Chinese rules and requests for access from their government - you can't please both). When it comes to who could put the most pressure on MS - the US or a foreign government, I'm pretty sure the US would win every time.
Hmmm. So we're supposed to distrust the NSA, but trust MS?

Am I the only one to see a fallacy with that logic?

Personally, I'm not putting any confidential or personal data on cloud storage. Period. I don't care who holds it, or where. If it's on MY systems, all I have to worry about is MY security. Could a hacker get onto my machines? Some yes, if they really wanted to, and if they knew I existed. But the machines with stuff I really consider personal? No, they cannot. Absolutely cannot, unless they break in, physically. Even then, it's encrypted.

For me, there's no need to store in the cloud, and ample reason not to. For you, whoever you are, business or individual, it's your data, your risk and your decision.

One last point. Quite why are MS doing this? Concern for our privacy? Or concern for protecting their own business model and revenue streams? I know what I think. They knew of at least some of the NSAs activities LONG before we did. Did that prompt them to move servers? Or did growing public concern?

Besides, as a US company, based in and operating from the US, they are subject to US laws and jurisdiction wherever they house servers. They've been telling us that no data is released to NSA without due process, and that NSA doesn't have direct access, for months. So what's changed? If they put their servers on Mars, and the NSA present them with a warrant, they have to give it up.

This is, as far as I'm concerned, merely a PR stunt, and as a measure for keeping the NSA out of our data, utterly meaningless. All IMHO, of course.
Oh my word, I never thought this day would come. M$ is actually thinking about what their customers want! :O
PR/Marketing attempt to create a unique selling point. They wouldn't be able to protect data in ireland any more than they can now.