HEXUS Forums :: 9 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Posted by kingpotnoodle - Fri 29 Jun 2012 12:12
Simple ideas often very useful, sounds great for low-moderate granularity locating, can't see if being as accurate as pure GPS but definitely better than the nothing or the wildly inaccurate results from cell triangulation we have in dead spots now.
Posted by Phage - Fri 29 Jun 2012 12:37
Sounds a lot like Skyhook.
http://www.skyhookwireless.com/howitworks/
Posted by wombat - Fri 29 Jun 2012 13:53
Lordy it's BAE, means the government will probably just say yes please for a figure of 100 million and end up paying ten fold!
Posted by CAT-THE-FIFTH - Fri 29 Jun 2012 15:12
I thought alternatives like GLONASS,Gallieo and Beidou already existed??

:p
Posted by Phage - Fri 29 Jun 2012 15:29
I've not heard of all of those but I assume that like GPS they're sateillite based ?
This and Skyhook are more about mapping the electromagnetic ‘map’ based on GPS readings. Once mapped, a position can be calculated without any sateillites.
Posted by edzieba - Fri 29 Jun 2012 16:42
Ir's not a replacement for GPS, nor is it satellite based. Basically, it uses GPS to get an initial position fix, the uses the relative motion of surrounding radio sources to track relative position (e.g if transmitter x is in front of you, then moves 90deg to the left, you have likely rotated 90deg to the right).
Posted by miniyazz - Fri 29 Jun 2012 19:55
I like how it uses GPS jammer signals to approximate your position :p
Posted by Phage - Fri 29 Jun 2012 20:30
edzieba
Ir's not a replacement for GPS, nor is it satellite based. Basically, it uses GPS to get an initial position fix, the uses the relative motion of surrounding radio sources to track relative position (e.g if transmitter x is in front of you, then moves 90deg to the left, you have likely rotated 90deg to the right).

GPS is sateillite. Perhaps you should read what I said and the Skyhook link.
Posted by edzieba - Mon 02 Jul 2012 06:48
Phage
GPS is sateillite. Perhaps you should read what I said and the Skyhook link.
You obviously did not actually read my post:
1) Skyhook does not use satellites for mapping. It derives an absolute position from comparing received signals to a database of known mobile phone masts and wifi hotspots.
2) the BAE system derives a relative position from unknown local transmitters. It does not use satellite transmissions, as these are too faint and would change very little when moving.
It can be given an initial absolute reference position, and this can be from GPS/Galileo/GLONASS positioning, a hand-input position, or simply from a 0,0,0;0°00:00 assumed reference.

The interesting part of this system would be knowing how they discriminate fixed unknown transmitters from mobile transmitters on-the-fly.