HEXUS Forums :: 26 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Posted by strengthofmind - Fri 27 Nov 2009 16:32
For fairness the comparison system should have been the similarly priced and sized acer timeline 1810tz, with an inferior processor to the 3810tz. This article just makes the AMD processor look unfairly bad: the SU9400 is only in premium ultra-portables that sell for far more, such as the Dell E4200, XT2 and Toshiba R600
Posted by MSIC - Fri 27 Nov 2009 17:12
Agreed, you really should be more aiming to compare things of a similar price.
That said, thanks for the review, good to be aware of systems like this.
Posted by MonkeyPaw - Sat 28 Nov 2009 05:29
Can you provide more info on the CPU? I'm curious what process its using, along with the p-states and voltages. I would assume it's griffin based?

Thanks!
Posted by Champman99 - Sun 29 Nov 2009 00:00
As mentioned above, the closest competitor on the Intel side is the Acer 1810 - and as an AMD fan it saddens me to say the Acer system would seem to be far superior.

To be competitive I think Congo needs to hit £350, then it comes off positively to the Atom, rather than negatively to Pentium ULV
Posted by man_bash - Mon 30 Nov 2009 04:48
Champman99
As mentioned above, the closest competitor on the Intel side is the Acer 1810 - and as an AMD fan it saddens me to say the Acer system would seem to be far superior.

To be competitive I think Congo needs to hit £350, then it comes off positively to the Atom, rather than negatively to Pentium ULV

Interesting opinion, BUT at 400 GBP it is 100 quid more expensive than the Atom system, and 200 less than the CULV system. How can you then say that it (Vision system) competes with a (CULV) product 1.5 times its price? It still delivers some punches, yeah, it falls short, but you can at least play a semi-decent game on it.
Posted by strengthofmind - Mon 30 Nov 2009 10:18
The Acer 1810TZ goes for £420 (http://bit.ly/5O261v) so with the MSI at £399, it is in direct competition, not 1.5 times the price as previously stated.

I guess I may have come across as unappreciative, I'm glad for the review, I just thought the reference systems were poorly chosen. I hope the AMD does compete with the low end CULV.
Posted by MSIC - Mon 30 Nov 2009 12:40
strengthofmind
The Acer 1810TZ goes for £420 (http://bit.ly/5O261v) so with the MSI at £399, it is in direct competition, not 1.5 times the price as previously stated.

I guess I may have come across as unappreciative, I'm glad for the review, I just thought the reference systems were poorly chosen. I hope the AMD does compete with the low end CULV.
+1
these were exactly my views too.
Posted by jimbo90210us - Mon 30 Nov 2009 17:11
Just to muddy the water a bit. The test compared the wind to the 3810T with a SU9400 @ 1.4GHz. The 1810 uses a SU4100 @ 1.3GHz, which may have other differences as well as the speed. The results are probably still an Intel win in terms of speed but not as flattering and there is the better graphics.
Anyway next week something different will come out and change the game again, just when I think I have decided on a perfect laptop.:):)
Posted by scaryjim - Thu 03 Dec 2009 15:52
jimbo90210us
Just to muddy the water a bit. The test compared the wind to the 3810T with a SU9400 @ 1.4GHz. The 1810 uses a SU4100 @ 1.3GHz, which may have other differences as well as the speed.
Also has only 2MB L3 cache, rather than 3MB. However, I doubt those differences would amount to much more than about 10% performance deficit, which would still put a SU4100 marginally ahead of an Athlon Neo.

At the end of the day, you have to decide whether the much better graphical capabilities outweigh the average battery life (because let's be honest, over 3 hours of continuous use *isn't* that bad), or whether battery life is the optimal concern. I'd be hard pushed to name a time when I have to use my laptop unplugged for more than three hours, whereas I do frequently use my laptops for casual gaming, so for my usage pattern the Congo platform looks pretty solid - small and light enough for portability, “reasonable” battery life if I can't get to a power socket, and decent performance + good graphics when I can plug in.
Posted by MadduckUK - Thu 03 Dec 2009 17:25
scaryjim
because let's be honest, over 3 hours of continuous use *isn't* that bad

its only recently that 3hrs wasn't “pretty good”.. amd need to get it jacked up sharpish tbh
Posted by wiak - Fri 04 Dec 2009 17:04
lol buy a External BD-ROM and you can play Blu-Ray Disc on the AMD Congo easy ;)

HD 3200 has FullHD 1080p Blu-Ray decode it far superior to GMA950

btw @ hexus did you guys test with Flash 10.1 and Catalyst 9.11? it will do hardware flash decoding on the HD 3200

btw who the heck uses their laptop with wireless off?
Posted by strengthofmind - Mon 07 Dec 2009 08:01
The Acer uses GS45 with 4500MHD, not 94X with GMA950, which isn't quite so good as the HD3200 afaik, but is still Blu Ray 1080p capable.
Posted by man_bash - Tue 08 Dec 2009 04:43
So, allowing for a 10% penalty you get for purchasing a 1810 instead of 3810, the performance scores inch in a lot closer, with intel having the same wins but by a halved margin. So,
MSI VS 1810T VS 3810T
PI.Fast10m would be 79 VS 67 VS 60 sec,
7Zip benchmark would be 2489 VS 2410 VS 2650 (So MSI system is better here vs the hypothetical 1810T, albeit by a small margin)
Cinebench would be 2456 VS 2642 VS 2906

It's kinda useless comparing something to a system that's yet to hit the shops though.
Posted by strengthofmind - Mon 14 Dec 2009 06:37
There are some benchmarks for the 1810TZ (1410TZ in the US) here:
http://www.azuricate.com/?p=59
http://www.laptop-review.eu/Reviews/Laptops/acer-aspire-timeline-1810tz-perfect-companion/page-7.html
Posted by Aerows - Sun 03 Jan 2010 19:31
I want one. I've been waiting until January for an ultraportable/netbook form factor, and it's because of Congo.

I can't buy an ultraportable, get attached to it, and then find out I can't even play old games on it - I already bought an Acer 1410 and discovered that the first 30 minutes that I had it. If it can't even play KOTOR II, since that is pretty old, it's not for me. I love a long battery life, but not as much as I love being able to get the longest mile out of it - you can't OC a CULV or the abysmal graphics chip that comes with it.

I know that I sacrifice battery life when I OC an AMD combo, but that's my choice, and I can also underclock and undervolt for longer battery life. That flexibility is simply not available in any Intel platform. Intel locks up their hardware unless you are willing to spend top dollar, and even then, you are on your own.

Graphics. ATI and Nvidia both outstrip Intel by at least 5 years in GPU performance. Intel might have decent hardware now with the GMA 4500, but we don't know whether they do or not, since they can't write a graphics driver to save their souls. I want an ultraportable with the capability I expect from a laptop, yet with diminished capability. I can get that with Ion and the Congo platform. I tried an Acer 1410 with the 4500mhd and couldn't even run 5 year old games, couldn't do 720p, and forget anything you might want to do that involves graphics.

I eagerly await the U230 and the x100e. Whichever comes first, is the one I'm buying.
Posted by haris101 - Tue 16 Feb 2010 03:24
What about the heat?

Please reply a.s.a.p since i'm thinking to buy one.

Many thanks in advance.
Posted by wiak - Mon 22 Feb 2010 00:36
i dont think its to noisy, as the MSI CR610 is not noisey, all laptops are noisey anyway
Posted by haris101 - Thu 11 Mar 2010 03:32
I just bought one. There is no poblem with the heat and noise. I notice slight lag when closing a window on Windows 7 while the aero visual effect is turned on, but so far, there is no annoying performance issue at all. It weighs around 1.45 kg with 6-cell battery and the charger + cable weighs around 0.4 kg.
Posted by wiak - Mon 15 Mar 2010 00:34
i recommend turning anything not needed off on startup
will save battery and make the pc faster ;)

and set brightness to minimum on battery
Posted by haris101 - Thu 25 Mar 2010 01:23
haris101
I just bought one. There is no poblem with the heat and noise. I notice slight lag when closing a window on Windows 7 while the aero visual effect is turned on, but so far, there is no annoying performance issue at all. It weighs around 1.45 kg with 6-cell battery and the charger + cable weighs around 0.4 kg.

Correction: The slight performance I mentioned before is because I use additional 22" wide screen monitor, so it doesn't count. I tested running Counter Strike Source's video stress test. The result is 31.7 fps @ 1366 * 768 and all video options set to max. No disappointment at all.
Posted by ddv2005 - Tue 30 Mar 2010 17:40
For now you can't get more than half CPU speed (800Mhz) on battery because the problem that MSI can't fix yet.

PS. I just got reply from MSI:
“According to AMD, the chipset platform for U230 (Congo) has this
power-saving feature during batter mode. Therefore, the condition
customer is facing is absolutely normal when AMD L335 maximum clock
1.6GHz @ AC mode; while maximum clock of 800MHz @ Battery Mode. Please
be advised.”

I can not believe that “maximum clock of 800MHz @ Battery Mode”!!!

Be aware from buying 800Mhz CPU in 2010 year!!!!
Posted by wiak - Mon 05 Apr 2010 08:38
read up on AMD's Cool ‘n’ Quiet technology before writing ;)
Posted by ddv2005 - Mon 05 Apr 2010 15:20
wiak
read up on AMD's Cool ‘n’ Quiet technology before writing ;)
Please think before writing ;)…Your psychic abilities let you down, because I know about this technology is much more than you. And I know that AMD L335 CPU have two P-States (1600Mhz and 800Mhz) and in either mode (AC and DC) it is possible to use both of these states. But the problem is that the U230 can not use both states on battery.No power profiles and settings on this does not affect. Moreover, MSI said that it should be…Allegedly, the AMD L335 has a maximum frequency 800Mhz on battery.
Posted by Methanoid - Fri 09 Apr 2010 08:34
ddv2005
Please think before writing ;)…Your psychic abilities let you down, because I know about this technology is much more than you. And I know that AMD L335 CPU have two P-States (1600Mhz and 800Mhz) and in either mode (AC and DC) it is possible to use both of these states. But the problem is that the U230 can not use both states on battery.No power profiles and settings on this does not affect. Moreover, MSI said that it should be…Allegedly, the AMD L335 has a maximum frequency 800Mhz on battery.

Hmm I've read several posts from people who have disabled PowerNow in BIOS and report 1600Mhz on battery ;)

Pity we cannot buy the X2-L335 model in UK :crazy:
Posted by ddv2005 - Fri 09 Apr 2010 14:31
Methanoid
Hmm I've read several posts from people who have disabled PowerNow in BIOS and report 1600Mhz on battery ;)
Yes. If you disable PowerNow then you will have 1600Mhz ALL TIME…even on idle. In this case the battery will spend so much faster. PowerNow was made to dynamically switch frequency and voltage on the fly to save the battery in idle mode and receive full power when it necessary. And it must work as declared.
I have answer from AMD about this problem:
“If you are unable to get the processor to run at full speed while on the battery, even after adjusting the windows power management properties, than the issue is a hard code in the BIOS that the manufacturer set and is not a limitation of the chip or chipset and is something you will have to bring up with them.”

After this confirmation from AMD, MSI has continued investigation the problem.

Dmitry
Posted by Methanoid - Mon 15 Nov 2010 12:40
Still no L335 dual core model in UK :(