HEXUS Forums :: 13 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Posted by format - Tue 12 May 2009 11:30
I'm thoroughly unimpressed.
Posted by 0iD - Tue 12 May 2009 11:32
:mexican:
Woo…BIG money! :)
Posted by kalniel - Tue 12 May 2009 11:41
If inflation is negative, then it's a bigger rise than it looks no?
Posted by Lee H - Tue 12 May 2009 11:49
7p an hour…. wahooo.

It's practically peanuts when you consider the rising costs of food-stuff and other essential things.
Posted by bsodmike - Tue 12 May 2009 12:21
Can I go supersize with that? :crazy:
Posted by cheesemp - Tue 12 May 2009 13:02
Its better than a wage cut (Just been threatened with one)….
Posted by jackvdbuk - Tue 12 May 2009 13:07
and how about none of this 18-21 get paid less rubbish, its a joke £4.83!
Posted by UnixNerd - Tue 12 May 2009 14:05
kalniel
If inflation is negative, then it's a bigger rise than it looks no?

If only it were that simple. The reason the RPI figure is negative is that house prices, mortgage repayments amd mortgage insurance payments are all significantly down. However if you take those statistics out then the CPI or consumer price index (what we pay for food etc) is actually running at just under 3% so in fact those on the minimum wage were just subjected to a wage cut as a significant proportion are likely not to be owners of their own property

Info from the office of National Statistics.

Unfortunatley I can't link it but google takes you straight to the most recent figures

Those people who are on a decent wage, own their own property and have a mortgate are currently less effected by the economic woes of the country and will remain so unless the downturn significantly worsens leading to wide spread layoffs, redundancies and short time working.
Posted by kalniel - Tue 12 May 2009 14:09
UnixNerd
If only it were that simple. The reason the RPI figure is negative is that house prices, mortgage repayments amd mortgage insurance payments are all significantly down. However if you take those statistics out then the CPI or consumer price index (what we pay for food etc) is actually running at just under 3% so in fact those on the minimum wage were just subjected to a wage cut as a significant proportion are likely not to be owners of their own property

Info from the office of National Statistics.
Yup I know that, but the point is RPI is used as the basis for wage settlements, so by most accounts anything to do with wages should be going down at the moment, not up.
Posted by roorooroo - Tue 12 May 2009 18:39
That's great for me..let me see..that's me better off 2.80 a week..shame the price of rent, bread, milk, necessities etc has gone up so much too.
Posted by Workaholic - Tue 12 May 2009 19:28
Should it be 2009 or 2010?
Posted by bull3t4u - Wed 13 May 2009 20:18
Lol :) I can buy a new car for that haha
Posted by TheAnimus - Wed 13 May 2009 23:29
The idea that the government should set a minum wage for the whole of the UK is just plain stupid, and hurts the poorest skilled people living in the non cheap areas.

The question is what is the effect of a minimum wage change on the economy? All too often people seam to have an almost religious like beleief in Keynesian economics based on desires rather than proven events. Either way its almost impossible to say for sure the effects of such a measure.

As such, whats the point in changing this minimum wage? You have to have a specail kind of arrogance to belive YOU are the one who should control it. Also you have to question the need. Given the wide availability of state benefits, there is already a natural effect because people don't *have* to work, it becomes worthless for them to bother enless a certain amount is reached.

If the government is going to decree that childcare must have no more than a 1 to 3 ratio for some ages, again they are dictating the fact that there will be some “have nots” a minimum wage is as such irrellivent, because its measure like that which keep people trapped on low salaries…..

God i hate governments interfering!