HEXUS Forums :: 10 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Posted by sleepyhead - Mon 16 Mar 2009 15:49
Nice but…what kind of “real world” benefit would we see from an overclock of 800Mhz?
Posted by Hicks12 - Mon 16 Mar 2009 15:57
Think of it this way, .8*4= 3.2 ghz extra, thats ALOT from such and easy increase. There will be quite a big benefit from tasks such as extracting, encoding etc.
Posted by R3MF - Mon 16 Mar 2009 16:43
a 3.2GHz AM3 quad is EXACTLY what i'm looking for.

all it needs now is a faster ‘premium’ brother and the 8 series chipset.
Posted by rkingb - Tue 17 Mar 2009 08:41
It's amazing how blase we are getting - less than 10 year's ago 800MHz would have been the norm for most people's desktop.
Posted by DeludedGuy - Tue 17 Mar 2009 09:00
rkingb
It's amazing how blase we are getting - less than 10 year's ago 800MHz would have been the norm for most people's desktop.

1999 I had a 500mhz P3 with 128mb of ram, which at the time was high end. In 2001, 1000mhz p4s were coming out IIRC.
Posted by fonz_valo - Tue 17 Mar 2009 11:22
rkingb
It's amazing how blase we are getting - less than 10 year's ago 800MHz would have been the norm for most people's desktop.

10 years ago i had a P1 166mhz with 16mb RAM with Win 98….. I'm pretty sure 800mhz was out of the question at the time. i remember my friend had a P2 300mhz (i think) with 32mb and i thought that was fast lol :D

Anyway back on topic….

I think AMD have got things right with the AM3, pricing is very good and the overclocking ability of the chips so far has been very impressive i mean just look at the 720 BE for example :)
Posted by Pob255 - Tue 17 Mar 2009 12:13
in 98 I had a p1 120mhz, 96mb of ram (which was a lot for that time), a 2gb susi hard drive and a dimond stealth 3d 2000 graphics card (with 2mb of ram)
I was running windows of a 17" crt at 1024x768 in 16bit colour and doing 3d work with 3d Studio R4 (the last dos based version)
Posted by CAT-THE-FIFTH - Wed 18 Mar 2009 00:02
I did not have a computer 10 years ago!! I could not afford one!! :(
Posted by rkingb - Mon 23 Mar 2009 07:48
fonz_valo
10 years ago i had a P1 166mhz with 16mb RAM with Win 98….. I'm pretty sure 800mhz was out of the question at the time. i remember my friend had a P2 300mhz (i think) with 32mb and i thought that was fast lol :D

Anyway back on topic….

I think AMD have got things right with the AM3, pricing is very good and the overclocking ability of the chips so far has been very impressive i mean just look at the 720 BE for example :)

OK my ten years was an over estimate…

I recently built a 7750 based system and was impressed by value for money and ease of overclocking. Hopefully AMD have turned the corner.
Posted by matadorluis - Mon 23 Mar 2009 23:07
11 years ago I have my first pc, P1 166 overclocked to 200 with everything stock and a rubish heatsink (not after market heatsinks at that time, I even didn't bother to check temps) and 64MB ram, a luxury ;-)
I played Quake 2, Jedy Knight and Unreal, cracking games!

I forgot to say my modem was PCI and 56KB, super fast in the last century :rockon2: