Because it's not free that will limit its appeal but also mean it will be less useful

So my results:

TR1950/Vega 56 - 42 796 (256.26 FPS)
Iphone 11 - 7290 (43 FPS)
Ipad Pro 10.5 2017 - 5375 (32 FPS)
Samsung 9+ (Exynos) - 2362 (14.10 FPS)


Not in the office today to test on more devices.
But mobile GPUs are still faraway even from lower-middle-class desktop GPU.
The thing is, they are getting more than good enough. And that is a big thing.

The current record score is 109,396 on a PC featuring an Intel Core i9-9900KS and Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090

I think it would have been wiser to say “at the time of writing” as that score is now 27th place :)

3dcandy
Because it's not free that will limit its appeal but also mean it will be less useful

Devs have to eat too :p

I think use for the end-user is limited, it's really for reviewers to help them compare phones especially, even more so if the stress test helps detect boosting stability.

I can get around the top 1060 result :D But.. my score is invalid due to g-sync/v-sync and I'm not going to mess around with global settings since it took long enough to get it working how I want (per application settings fire fine for individual 3dmark tests but still flag as invalid due to the global settings)

kalniel
Devs have to eat too :p

I think use for the end-user is limited, it's really for reviewers to help them compare phones especially, even more so if the stress test helps detect boosting stability.

I can get around the top 1060 result :D But.. my score is invalid due to g-sync/v-sync and I'm not going to mess around with global settings since it took long enough to get it working how I want (per application settings fire fine for individual 3dmark tests but still flag as invalid due to the global settings)

Exactly - perhaps I wasn't quite clear enough. I just think as you say it's a limited tool currently

RTX 2080 Ti, i7-8700: 60142 360 fps