DanceswithUnix
Gigabit Internet connections have been around for some time and getting more popular, but exceeding that speed is difficult if no-one can plug into the router. Even many wireless access points can in theory exceed a gigabit in throughput. USB connections are up to 10Gbps, even a single old rotating rust disk can saturate gigabit on a big read or write.
Networking is a bottleneck, and it is getting worse.
Yeah. I'm not really questioning that, though. I was more querying what usage casev“the vast majority of home users” have that needs it.
Some will, sure. But that “vast majority”?
What I was getting at is that for home users (business use is a different case) there has to be a sufficiently large market for manufacturers to spend time and money developing, and stocking, a router capable of doing that.
It's one thing sticking (for example) a thousand pound price tag on a business device where there's a case for it (and a tax writeoff), and doing it for the domestic mass market.
I get that there's a case for it being possible, but I'm struggling with why “the vast majority of home users” would find it
necessary, especially as it would no doubt involve a premium, and most home users are resistant to buying stuff without a very clear justification …. and often, not even then.