HEXUS Forums :: 14 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Posted by aidanjt - Mon 26 Nov 2018 12:44
No, go away with your stupid camera arrays. You only need 1 really great sensor.
Posted by Friesiansam - Mon 26 Nov 2018 12:51
This is getting stupid, although I do wonder which manufacturer is going to be in first, with a phone covered in RGB LEDs…
Posted by Ozaron - Mon 26 Nov 2018 13:00
friesiansam
this is getting stupid, although i do wonder which manufacturer is going to be in first, with a phone covered in rgb leds…

blablablaalalblbla can't hear you!!

:(
Posted by philehidiot - Mon 26 Nov 2018 13:18
I can see this as a 3D imaging gimmick. I can't see it working very well as a 3D gimmick.

If it is to be used on a flagship phone, it'll need a separate proper camera otherwise the compromises will be so great I can't see it being competitive. So it'll be silly expensive.

No change there then.
Posted by philehidiot - Mon 26 Nov 2018 13:24
Oh and “AI software” which will allow you to “change a subject's head”… umm, I can't see this being abused in any way shape or form.

How long until “School kid kills self after fake naked selfie made on smartphone spread around school” hits the headlines? Simple image editing is one thing as it's so obviously fake, but making it seamless and easy is opening the door to all sorts of trouble. Photoshopping should remain a skill.
Posted by cheesemp - Mon 26 Nov 2018 16:44
gillette LG - the best a man phone can get!

Why stop at 16…
Posted by atemporal - Mon 26 Nov 2018 22:43
All those eyes watching you. Remind you of anything?

Posted by Ozaron - Tue 27 Nov 2018 10:25
atemporal
All those eyes watching you. Remind you of anything?

Stop trying to make me associate all the cameras with cute fuzzy animals, I'm trying to maintain a cynical and distrusting attitude here…
Posted by jibjab - Tue 27 Nov 2018 11:18
Even with the size of modern phones I'm not sure even if the camera were 6" apart that it'd be able to capture that much extra information to make an object even slightly rotatable. They could compete with 1830s stereoscopic images though.
Posted by aidanjt - Tue 27 Nov 2018 13:37
Ozaron
Stop trying to make me associate all the cameras with cute fuzzy animals, I'm trying to maintain a cynical and distrusting attitude here…

You and I have very different ideas of what constitutes as ‘cute’.
Posted by EvilCycle - Wed 28 Nov 2018 10:53
jibjab
Even with the size of modern phones I'm not sure even if the camera were 6" apart that it'd be able to capture that much extra information to make an object even slightly rotatable. They could compete with 1830s stereoscopic images though.

My ancient HTC Evo 3D could take images that are able to be slightly rotated by moving the phone/screen around, and that just used a simple dual lens solution!

I've actually kept that phone safe in a drawer as it's niche tech does still come in handy, especially for holiday videos (you can view them on a 3dtv and get a real sense of seeing the places you have been again, 3D may be dead but I am very happy I invested in it to be perfectly honest, but now I am just rambling off topic, sorry!).
Posted by peterb - Wed 28 Nov 2018 17:42
I wonder if there is a market for a camera with a built in cellphone? :innocent:
Posted by spacein_vader - Wed 28 Nov 2018 18:35
peterb
I wonder if there is a market for a camera with a built in cellphone? :innocent:
The Nokia Pureview 808 didn't sell too well so I'd guess not.
Posted by 3dcandy - Fri 30 Nov 2018 07:38
peterb
I wonder if there is a market for a camera with a built in cellphone? :innocent:
Nor the Samsung Galaxy phone thing…