HEXUS Forums :: 70 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Posted by DanceswithUnix - Fri 13 Jan 2017 16:37
I'm a sucker for Mario Kart :D
Posted by Iota - Fri 13 Jan 2017 16:48
Not at that price point.
Posted by jigger - Fri 13 Jan 2017 16:48
Thats a lot for a tablet. With a game you're very close to PS4 Pro money. I think Nintendo might have some problems selling these.

The Nvidia shield failed spectacularly at half this price. I think the problem is the console market is driven by kids and people obsessed with performance numbers and this might not appeal to either. You never know though, Nintendo are probably the only firm people will over pay for because of the games.
Posted by nar53 - Fri 13 Jan 2017 16:55
Not a chance.
Posted by Ferral - Fri 13 Jan 2017 16:57
It seems quite extortionate given what it is, I did read that it is more powerful when docked, release no doubt will see if it is true.

Don't get me wrong, the new innovation is pretty cool but pricing is way to high, for those 2 controller side pieces they are saying £75 per set which still puts a flashy tablet and dock at £200. Then also the whole charging a monthly fee like PS+ or XBLive Gold, according to Eurogamer you get 1 game per month, either a NES or SNES classic, now it is a bit ambiguous but it sounds like you only get the game for a month, not like PS+ where you can re-download something from ages ago provided you added it to account and have a live sub and it stays with you until you uninstall it.

Just have to wait and see, I am not really seeing anything better than the Wii U at the moment, maybe they should have done a Wii U refresh with more power, normal controller and so on to draw in the crowds.

I want one yes, but at that price most likely not

Here's hoping on a SNES Mini………
Posted by sykobee - Fri 13 Jan 2017 17:06
Well $299 translates to £294 (inc. VAT). So we're getting a better deal than the US (or alternatively, the price is likely to rise to £299 if the pound falls any further against the dollar).

That's the only good thing about the price. The JoyCons are clearly advanced, but that makes them expensive (especially compared to a PS4 controller) and they don't look that comfortable to use either, being dictated by the form factor of the console.

OTOH Zelda, Kart and Mario…
Posted by Shane74 - Fri 13 Jan 2017 17:08
No chance, I'll buy the 4k 144hz HDR monitor announced at CES instead. ;)
Should last me a decade, Get my money's worth!
Posted by jigger - Fri 13 Jan 2017 17:11
Ferral
It seems quite extortionate given what it is, I did read that it is more powerful when docked, release no doubt will see if it is true.

Don't get me wrong, the new innovation is pretty cool but pricing is way to high, for those 2 controller side pieces they are saying £75 per set which still puts a flashy tablet and dock at £200. Then also the whole charging a monthly fee like PS+ or XBLive Gold, according to Eurogamer you get 1 game per month, either a NES or SNES classic, now it is a bit ambiguous but it sounds like you only get the game for a month, not like PS+ where you can re-download something from ages ago provided you added it to account and have a live sub and it stays with you until you uninstall it.

Just have to wait and see, I am not really seeing anything better than the Wii U at the moment, maybe they should have done a Wii U refresh with more power, normal controller and so on to draw in the crowds.

I want one yes, but at that price most likely not

Here's hoping on a SNES Mini………

Yeah I think Nintendo should have gone for a high performance under the TV box. Something that could have run 1920x1080 at 50-60FPS with some AA.

The online pay monthly service just sounds strange considering this is obviously more DS than Wii. How are people going to connect to the service while out?
Posted by DanceswithUnix - Fri 13 Jan 2017 17:20
Note pre-orders are already selling out!
Posted by Rubarb - Fri 13 Jan 2017 17:22
I like the idea of it but would I buy one and at that much …….. “No!”
Posted by jigger - Fri 13 Jan 2017 17:33
DanceswithUnix
Note pre-orders are already selling out!

The'll probably end up on ebay for £1k a pop.
Posted by eatonm62 - Fri 13 Jan 2017 17:47
A bit too over priced for me. I am still waiting to get hold of a NES Classic Mini they have really dropped the ball from a supply demand standpoint.
Posted by Output - Fri 13 Jan 2017 17:59
No intention whatsoever of buying it. Just like the Wii and the Wii U, it just doesn't appeal to me.
Posted by Marenghi - Fri 13 Jan 2017 18:14
Not even slightly interested
Posted by el_raberto - Fri 13 Jan 2017 18:18
My family enjoyed the Wii in it's day. The Wii U didn't appeal and the Switch isn't a million miles away from it conceptually. Then there’s the price which I think is too high so no, no Switch for us.
Posted by anselhelm - Fri 13 Jan 2017 19:23
I think of lot of people will buy this at launch, particularly those receiving their end-of-financial-year bonus, but I won't be one of them.

I think it looks great, but it's too expensive, especially in terms of peripherals and games. Given its portable nature, I also wouldn't be surprised if a Switch XL or Switch Lite launches in a year or two.

Finances and quality of games permitting, this does interest me in a way that the Wii U simply never did, but it's not at the right price point.

Hopefully this will be the N64 launch where they dropped the price from £250 to £150 in pretty short measure when says started off sluggish. (At £280, it's a tough sell. At £180, it'd be a very-tempting offer.)
Posted by flearider - Fri 13 Jan 2017 19:39
why we all have pc's
Posted by The Hand - Fri 13 Jan 2017 20:19
Cut the price in half with mario kart thrown in i'll think about ;) I'd rather put the money towards a good 4k monitor to be honest.
Posted by Potbellieddwarf - Fri 13 Jan 2017 20:50
DanceswithUnix
Note pre-orders are already selling out!


Nintendo are well known for holding back stocks to make the hype for the item more. They did it with the Wii.

But no I won't be getting one.
Posted by Friesiansam - Fri 13 Jan 2017 21:05
flearider
why we all have pc's

Couldn't agree more.
Posted by ET3D - Fri 13 Jan 2017 22:29
Just got a Wii U, so I suppose I might get a Switch a in 2021. :) I'm not enough of a gamer these days to go for a new console.

I do hope that the using a common mobile part will allow Nintendo to upgrade this easily, offering a more powerful Switch in the future, with compatibility for the older Switch.
Posted by Wrinkly - Fri 13 Jan 2017 23:00
Definately not. I think consoles are great for those that have a use for them but even then why would anyone waste money on ‘the 3rd option’? If you want a console, grab a Playstation. Otherwise just use a PC at home or a smart phone on the move.
Posted by lon3wolf2002 - Fri 13 Jan 2017 23:51
Not for me this time.
Posted by fend_oblivion - Sat 14 Jan 2017 01:12
No. The price is too high and the main draw of it (the portability) is wasted because of the poor battery life (3 hours for Zelda).

Nintendo should just remove itself from the console market and focus only on handheld gaming (not the console/handheld hybrid like the Switch is) and/or start releasing its older games (from the NES all the way to the Wii U) on Android, iOS, PS4, XO, and PC. They'll be rolling in money.
Posted by me-yeah - Sat 14 Jan 2017 03:55
your better off with an xperia z
Posted by dylanlaw79 - Sat 14 Jan 2017 07:05
Not likely
Posted by cheesemp - Sat 14 Jan 2017 08:21
Not until the price drops. £279 is serious hardware money and I'd only want it for Zelda…
Posted by FRISH - Sat 14 Jan 2017 09:19
Maybe if the price drops/gets a game included with a price drop on the games on top. A little bummed about the online subscription too.
Posted by Jaffo - Sat 14 Jan 2017 10:03
Nope. Not particularly into Nintendo stuff, but I have enjoyed the odd game or two from the Zelda series.
Posted by hellig - Sat 14 Jan 2017 10:56
no thanks hardly ever uses the tablet i have.
Posted by Friesiansam - Sat 14 Jan 2017 12:27
Not on your nellie.
Posted by CAPTAIN_ALLCAPS - Sat 14 Jan 2017 12:34
jigger
Ferral
It seems quite extortionate given what it is, I did read that it is more powerful when docked, release no doubt will see if it is true.

Don't get me wrong, the new innovation is pretty cool but pricing is way to high, for those 2 controller side pieces they are saying £75 per set which still puts a flashy tablet and dock at £200. Then also the whole charging a monthly fee like PS+ or XBLive Gold, according to Eurogamer you get 1 game per month, either a NES or SNES classic, now it is a bit ambiguous but it sounds like you only get the game for a month, not like PS+ where you can re-download something from ages ago provided you added it to account and have a live sub and it stays with you until you uninstall it.

Just have to wait and see, I am not really seeing anything better than the Wii U at the moment, maybe they should have done a Wii U refresh with more power, normal controller and so on to draw in the crowds.

I want one yes, but at that price most likely not

Here's hoping on a SNES Mini………

Yeah I think Nintendo should have gone for a high performance under the TV box. Something that could have run 1920x1080 at 50-60FPS with some AA.

The online pay monthly service just sounds strange considering this is obviously more DS than Wii. How are people going to connect to the service while out?

I'm hoping it will be viewed more as a replacement for the 3ds.

I've never owned a handheld. Not because there aren't any good games - there are some like Phoenix Wright, Bravely Default and Persona 4 Golden that I am interested in - but because I have never seen the point of playing any game that matters at low resolution on a tiny screen.

Having a low resolution mode on the go and a full resolution mode when displaying on a big screen is something I think should have happened a long time ago (unlike that Playstation TV thing…).
Posted by outwar6010 - Sat 14 Jan 2017 13:27
Nope. Nintendo should give up making hardware and should just develop their mobile games for phones and their other ones on proper consoles/ pc.
Posted by DanceswithUnix - Sat 14 Jan 2017 15:16
cheesemp
Not until the price drops. £279 is serious hardware money and I'd only want it for Zelda…

So the £80 for the Zelda collectors edition might not interest you then :D
Posted by Tunnah - Sat 14 Jan 2017 16:09
I've never been so sure in my life of a product failing since Kellogg's released their cereal “Bits O' Auschwitz”
Posted by aramil - Sat 14 Jan 2017 17:33
err….. Nope….

I can think of better things to blow nearly £300 on.
Posted by AGTDenton - Sat 14 Jan 2017 18:16
I've been itching to get a Wii-U for ages, but Nintendo have a habbit of just turning things off and ditching their old consoles so it's never given me confidence to put my money on the table especially if say the Virtual Console just disappears (which is what I bought the original Wii for). A big problem with the Switch is that the games are a whopping £50… I wouldnt pay that for BF1 like EA were asking so I wouldnt be getting these, and their depreciation value will be high.
The price of the hardware actually doesnt put me off at all, but the ongoing costs of an online subscription and wildly high game prices do.
I won't be pre-ordering but will be watching the final product with hawk eyes. Nintendo have always made brilliant single player games, somehow they tap into my dyslexic and autistic mind.
Posted by Presto86 - Sat 14 Jan 2017 18:19
Will I buy one……No
Posted by MonkeyKing1969 - Sat 14 Jan 2017 22:52
Nope. I think they made a device at cross-purposes; a Jack-of-No-Trades.
Posted by Euphonium - Sun 15 Jan 2017 01:03
At £280 ($340) in the UK, with no games, that's just too darn expensive. I love the concept, but unless the price hits ~£200 including one good game, I'll give it a miss.
Posted by mojothejester - Sun 15 Jan 2017 01:10
Probably, but only when there's a brand new Mario Kart and a Zelda game that won't come to Wii U. I've got more physical Wii/Wii U/3DS games than I've ever had at any one time for any console or PC, so I think we like Nintendo in our house :-)
Posted by Saracen - Sun 15 Jan 2017 03:21
Will I buy? No.

Why not? First, pricing. Second, I neither need nor want a portabke, battery-powered console, so I'd be paying a premium for features I've no interest in at all.

XBOne? Perhaps, if MS allow me to physically disable cameras, mics, and subject to my privacy audit.

PS4? A little more likely, subject to a similar privacy audit.

But I'm not bothered enough about either to have even looked at them for at least a couple of years.

Switch? I just don't see it.
Posted by chj - Sun 15 Jan 2017 07:32
Friesiansam
flearider
why we all have pc's

Couldn't agree more.

Because a PC is hardly portable and local split-screen is hardly included in a lot of titles anymore?

But at that price yeah i'm not buying it.
Posted by Spud1 - Sun 15 Jan 2017 12:01
I pre ordered one friday morning. Not had a Nintendo console for a while (I skilled the failure that was the Wii-U) so i am curious what they do with this one. I don't think it's too expensive - I think they got the launch price about right and they will still sell out at that price. Worth a punt to play the new Zelda :)
Posted by ET3D - Sun 15 Jan 2017 12:32
Reading about it some more, I'm looking forward to seeing what is done with the haptic feedback and IR camera. The main reason I have consoles is for alternate style interaction that doesn't exists on the PC.
Posted by Wozza63 - Sun 15 Jan 2017 13:18
It's a high price and doesn't even include a game in that base price. Wii Sports wasn't exactly the best game of all time but it was something to keep people entertained a while before other stuff came out. But you gotta pay £50 for a game on top of that £280. I personally don't think the hardware price is too much. It's everything else that bumps up the price far too much. Shame, at £200 and slightly cheaper games and other hardware and it probably would have been a sale for me.
Posted by raven1001 - Sun 15 Jan 2017 15:18
Haha no I won't. It's wiiu all over again, game support will soon dry up thanks to the weak ass mobile gpu. And £300 for a glorified 720p tablet with no game and rippoff accessory prices. On top of that they want money for their crap online service. Nintendo are living a fantasy land and I can't wait for them to fail.
Posted by Dayks - Sun 15 Jan 2017 18:04
Not a chance, not owned any nintendo device since gameboy advanced and from the direction these are going it looks like I never will.
Posted by b0redom - Sun 15 Jan 2017 21:38
Depends if there are any games I want to play on it. To be honest I don't really care about t what console is more powerful. I did want to play uncharted 4 so I bought a PS4. If there's something compelling on the new Nintendo box I'll buy that too.
Posted by tag75 - Sun 15 Jan 2017 23:28
I am a PC fan all day long , no consoles for me.
Posted by DanceswithUnix - Mon 16 Jan 2017 07:26
raven1001
Haha no I won't. It's wiiu all over again, game support will soon dry up thanks to the weak ass mobile gpu.

The Wii-U had a DX9 class GPU which must have been a pain for people trying to port to it. This might not be any more powerful, but easier to port to would make a difference. I wonder if games will come out that are docked only or hand waving to portable use though.

The price does seem high, I wonder if that is Nvidia or Nintendo.
Posted by azrael- - Mon 16 Jan 2017 08:41
Although I game (on the PC and quite frequently), I'm not really the target audience for a console. If I were it certainly wouldn't be this one.

Also, someone above loosely compared this to the nVidia Shield TV and how it failed in the market. I'm still firmly of the belief, that the Shield TV is much more a streaming device than a games console and really ought to be targeted as such by nVidia. Bundling the remote with the new version is a laudable first step, though.
Posted by ET3D - Mon 16 Jan 2017 09:14
DanceswithUnix
The Wii-U had a DX9 class GPU

The Wii U has a DX10.1 class GPU. I imagine the most painful part for ports , hardware-wise, is the 1GB RAM.
Posted by 3s-gtech - Mon 16 Jan 2017 09:25
DanceswithUnix
The Wii-U had a DX9 class GPU

DX10/10.1 or OpenGL 3.3.
Posted by DanceswithUnix - Mon 16 Jan 2017 09:36
ET3D
The Wii U has a DX10.1 class GPU. I imagine the most painful part for ports , hardware-wise, is the 1GB RAM.

Interesting, so it does. I didn't realise there were two GPUs on the Wii-U, one for Wii compatibility and a VLIW5 one. Somehow I got the impression they had just stretched the Gamecube GPU again, like they did with Wii.

Ease of code porting did seem to be a problem on the Wii-U though, do we have a spec for the Switch ram size? A quick google didn't turn anything up for me.
Posted by Sixiepoo - Mon 16 Jan 2017 09:36
jigger
Thats a lot for a tablet. With a game you're very close to PS4 Pro money. I think Nintendo might have some problems selling these.

The Nvidia shield failed spectacularly at half this price. I think the problem is the console market is driven by kids and people obsessed with performance numbers and this might not appeal to either. You never know though, Nintendo are probably the only firm people will over pay for because of the games.

dont forget, im sure theres enough (more than enough) nintendo hardcore fans who is willing to pay that price… (I wouldnt)
Posted by Mski - Mon 16 Jan 2017 10:36
My biggest problem with this, is full price (60$) games for 720p. I might sound like a “crybaby”, but the pricing is weird, consider X-box one, PS4 and PC games costs the same, with higher and better performance overall.
Posted by b0redom - Mon 16 Jan 2017 11:10
Mski
My biggest problem with this, is full price (60$) games for 720p. I might sound like a “crybaby”, but the pricing is weird, consider X-box one, PS4 and PC games costs the same, with higher and better performance overall.

But better resolution and graphics don't necessarily make a better game, and it will be the games that sell the console. IMO of course.
Posted by DanceswithUnix - Mon 16 Jan 2017 11:32
b0redom
But better resolution and graphics don't necessarily make a better game, and it will be the games that sell the console. IMO of course.

It will provide the highest resolution Zelda and Mario Kart possible. For some that will be enough.

I don't see my parents getting one, so it won't be the runaway success the Wii was.
Posted by Stu C - Mon 16 Jan 2017 12:36
Shane74
No chance, I'll buy the 4k 144hz HDR monitor announced at CES instead. ;)
Should last me a decade, Get my money's worth!

I've not looked into it, but I think those monitors will be more than £300!!!

Lots of comments about 720p gaming, making it inferior to other consoles… it does 1080p when docked and plugged into the TV. The handheld console is 720p, with a 6.2" screen, which isn't too bad.
Posted by lumireleon - Mon 16 Jan 2017 13:13
If I get the money, I would.
Posted by jnutt - Mon 16 Jan 2017 13:17
Nope
Posted by Mski - Mon 16 Jan 2017 14:05
Stu C;966
Shane74
No chance, I'll buy the 4k 144hz HDR monitor announced at CES instead. ;)
Should last me a decade, Get my money's worth!

I've not looked into it, but I think those monitors will be more than £300!!!

Lots of comments about 720p gaming, making it inferior to other consoles… it does 1080p when docked and plugged into the TV. The handheld console is 720p, with a 6.2" screen, which isn't too bad.

900p when docked.
Posted by Mski - Mon 16 Jan 2017 14:06
Mski
Stu C;966
Shane74
No chance, I'll buy the 4k 144hz HDR monitor announced at CES instead. ;)
Should last me a decade, Get my money's worth!

I've not looked into it, but I think those monitors will be more than £300!!!

Lots of comments about 720p gaming, making it inferior to other consoles… it does 1080p when docked and plugged into the TV. The handheld console is 720p, with a 6.2" screen, which isn't too bad.

900p when docked.

With The legend of Zelda: Breath of the wild! Sorry.
Posted by flufflogic - Mon 16 Jan 2017 14:24
In short: no.

In detail: £50-60 a game, £75 for a pair of Joy Cons to play multiplayer, £28 for the dock that charges Joy Cons, £70 for the “pro pad”… And 5 launch games. Everything is poorly priced (they're charging £5 each for glorified wrist straps!) the online service sounds awful (voice chat and parental controls via phone apps? A SNES/NES classic that is only available for a month each time?) and the games that there are either have better versions coming to other platforms or are re-issues. No. I'll get Breath of the Wild for Wii U (apparently the difference is a few less frames, so…) and be happy until a price crash, thanks.
Posted by loyal986 - Sun 22 Jan 2017 06:47
No, No Way, Never Ever.
Its way too… Naaah, its crapy console and going with ngridia thats why the price is high. Going X86 would made them a choice but Arm is too damn weak.
A console with Zen and Radeon would shine on. But we have to wait for that…
Posted by Spreadie - Sun 22 Jan 2017 11:14
No. I don't do consoles.
Posted by el_tone - Fri 17 Feb 2017 21:53
I might if the games offer something different from PC and PS4. Would have to be after a hefty price drop though.
Posted by kingfoo - Sat 18 Feb 2017 15:32
Iota
Not at that price point.

:) same
Posted by Saracen - Sun 19 Feb 2017 00:13
As others have said, not at that price. The subscription aspect is a turnoff too, but as I'm not interested at that price, or even near to it, I haven't bothered looking into the implications.