facebook rss twitter

Researchers consider impact of 3D printing on indoor air quality

by Mark Tyson on 20 November 2018, 12:21

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qadzry

Add to My Vault: x

Over the last few years 3D printing has gone from being a headline grabbing futuristic technology to becoming rather commonplace. 3D printing now has wide OS and productivity software support and the ability to part-customise various tech products and accessories via 3D printing templates has become a selling point. With the technology widely supported and 3D printer prices becoming better and more affordable, more and more people now have a 3D printer in the home.

3D printer air quality hazard

The UL Chemical Safety and Georgia Institute of Technology have recently released some research finding concerning the impact of 3D printing on indoor air quality. After two years of observations and recording of data the researchers found that "many desktop 3D printers generate ultrafine particles (UFPs) while in operation".

UFPs of almost any kind can be harmful to life, and that's why air quality monitors count PM2.5 and PM10 stats. These small particles can penetrate deep into the human pulmonary system - where they can become problematic. However, the hazards are compounded by the findings that "more than 200 different volatile organic compounds (VOCs), many of which are known or suspected irritants and carcinogens, are also released while 3D printers are in operation". In particular, it was noted that the fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D printers designed for general public use emit high levels of ultrafine and fine particles.

With these 3D printing devices in use in confined office spaces, classrooms, and home rooms, the researchers have some risk reduction recommendations. If you operate a 3D printer you should lessen your risk by:

  • Operating 3D printers only in well-ventilated areas
  • Setting the nozzle temperature at the lower end of the suggested temperature range for filament materials
  • Standing away from operating machines
  • Using machines and filaments that have been tested and verified to have low emissions.

2D laser printers

Back in the noughties there was some similar minded research looking into indoor air quality issues created by laser printers and copiers. Laser printer mechanisms can release ozone and fine toner particles into the air. However there hasn't been a large scale study to date to really determine if sitting next to a laser printer, for example, is bad for your health. It is noted by ABC that similar particles from combustion and vehicle exhausts can bring on asthma attacks in people with the condition and worsen heart disease.

Recommendations for laser printer / copier use in your indoor environment are roughly the same as those bullet pointed above; try to keep the printer in a well ventilated area and avoid close proximity to the device in times when it is in use.

Industrial disease?

History shows that people work in environments where it isn't known whether it is safe or not until it is too late. Hazardous substances were also widely used inappropriately in the home in the past. I wonder what might be the biggest hidden killers of the 21st century.



HEXUS Forums :: 12 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
This is why it has become common practice (especially when printing ABS) to place the printer in an enclosure, and vent it outdoors by running a vent pipe out a window.
and people think nothing of being exposed to Ozone from the office MFD
Meh…until they actually show numbers and what tests they did, this is still all just rumor and speculation. Either get the science out and PROVE that it's bad or shut up about the whole 3D particulate thing!

This article says FDM printers spew tons of ultrafine and fine particulate, so where's your proof? Come on, Hexus editor, where's your proof that they do? I can say for certain my 3D printer has never been covered by fine particulates. My filament has never been dusty. So where's the proof?
iworrall
This is why it has become common practice (especially when printing ABS) to place the printer in an enclosure, and vent it outdoors by running a vent pipe out a window.

Typically it has nothing to do with “particulates”, if they exist. It's usually that people are butthurt over the fact that ABS smells a little and they don't want to smell hot plastic in the room.

For ABS, enclosures are used to keep the environment HOT because ABS's middle name is “I love to warp”. Venting an enclosed ABS printer would be about the worst thing you could do though unless you had a ton of auxiliary heating and a way to keep the air movement off of the print so it doesn't warp it even more.
DaMoot
Meh…until they actually show numbers and what tests they did, this is still all just rumor and speculation. Either get the science out and PROVE that it's bad or shut up about the whole 3D particulate thing!

This article says FDM printers spew tons of ultrafine and fine particulate, so where's your proof? Come on, Hexus editor, where's your proof that they do? I can say for certain my 3D printer has never been covered by fine particulates. My filament has never been dusty. So where's the proof?

By the time proof has been gathered, the damage may be done. What is the problem with taking simple precautions to minimise the risk to as low as reasonably practicable?