facebook rss twitter

Blocking the Pirate Bay in Holland fails to have the desired effect

by Mark Tyson on 23 August 2013, 14:30

Tags: The Pirate Bay

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qabz3z

Add to My Vault: x

A research paper published on Thursday by the University of Amsterdam (UvA) and Tilburg University suggests the court ordered blocking of The Pirate Bay (TPB) isn’t having the desired effect upon Dutch illegal download activity. An article on TechWorld reports that the university researchers found that the percentage of ISP subscribers downloading from illegal sources actually increased following the Pirate Bay block.

The courts in the Netherlands ordered major ISPs to block TPB, the blocks were implemented in May 2012. Antipiracy organisation Brein pushed for TPB blocking saying that similar previous moves in Denmark and Italy significantly reduced visitors to the site. The blockade covers 80 per cent of Dutch internet users.

Instead of looking simply at TPB the university researchers have looked at illegal downloading as a whole and in their conclusions found that “we do not find strong indications of the long-lasting effectiveness of such an approach in preventing consumers from making use of illegal sources.” In fact some of the blocking ISPs experienced more illegal downloading over their networks after the Pirate Bay block was put in place.

TechWorld reports that UPC, KPN, Tele 2 and T-Mobile together found that 18.4 per cent of their users were downloading from illegal sources six months after the block was put in place. Before the block the same group of ISP reported 15.7 per cent of users illegally downloaded files.

The researchers said that a court action like the Dutch Pirate Bay block “often has an immediate effect which tends to fade out after a period of typically six months, as illegal supply and demand find other places to meet”. Will this academic research mean less of these internet blocks will be enforced by governments and courts in the future?

Meanwhile copyright trolls still seed on TPB

In related news TechHive says that it strongly suspects various adult movies on TPB have been uploaded and are being seeded (made digitally available to others) by a ‘copyright troll’ associated with Prenda Law. The files in question have been uploaded by a user called Sharkmp4 who has uploaded over 40 blue movies since 2011 in what is described as a ‘honeypot’ operation, aiming to harvest downloader IP addresses to determine downloader IDs. There are a number of copyright court cases on record concerning files downloaded from the Sharkmp4 seeder.



HEXUS Forums :: 10 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Sadly their doing the same thing here in the United States as well. Their basically trying to coral people by their ip address and then block their access to the site. But their are a ton of Mirror sites that are up in its place filling the void of TPB.
piratebrowser or immunicity sorts that out. :)
In related news TechHive says that it strongly suspects various adult movies on TPB have been uploaded and are being seeded (made digitally available to others) by a ‘copyright troll’ associated with Prenda Law. The files in question have been uploaded by a user called Sharkmp4 who has uploaded over 40 blue movies since 2011 in what is described as a ‘honeypot’ operation, aiming to harvest downloader IP addresses to determine downloader IDs.

Surely if the owner of the material deliberately hosts it on a website for download and people download it, they cannot be prosecuted for illegal downloading of it, since it was provided to them by the copyright holder?
miniyazz
Surely if the owner of the material deliberately hosts it on a website for download and people download it, they cannot be prosecuted for illegal downloading of it, since it was provided to them by the copyright holder?

It's a pretty dirty trick, but I think it might be defensible.

Technically, the copyright holder did not make any indication that it had relinquished control of the copyright. Everybody who visited TPB and downloaded those files can reasonably be assumed to know that they were breaking copyright by doing so. Also, the copyright holder didn't make the files available; the law firm did, and I suppose if the makers decline to prosecute the law firm for doing this then there's no case to answer.
http://come.in/ is a useful proxy site if anyone is in need.