facebook rss twitter

New digital camera lens is based on the compound eye of a fire ant

by Mark Tyson on 2 May 2013, 16:34

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qabvrf

Add to My Vault: x

Details of a new innovation in digital camera lenses have been published by a research team headed up by Prof. John Rogers of the University of Illinois. The new lens is based upon the type of compound eye you see in many insects but specifically fire ants and bark beetles. Cameras using this lens can capture a very wide 160 degree field of view with “low aberrations, high acuity to motion and an infinite depth of field”. The camera developed by the researchers sported 180 microlenses and each one captured a unique angle of the subject photographed.

What is the use of such a lens?

It may sound interesting to have an ant’s eye view of the world but what is the practical use of such a thing? There are clues in the opening paragraph, above, referring to the very wide angle view and infinite depth of field. An infinite depth of field means that everything in front of the lens will be in-focus, the image obtained will mainly be limited by sensor quality and resolution, available light and such things as air quality on the day of the photograph.

Talking to CNN News Prof. Rogers said “We feel that the insect world provides extremely impressive examples of engineering - in the vision, flight, power and sensing systems. I, personally, have been intrigued by the insect eye for as long as I can remember.” Turning to the specific topic of imaging systems he added; “Nature provides a remarkable diversity of ideas for designs in cameras. We think that it will be interesting to explore some of these, because in many cases, the concepts offer unique and powerful capabilities in imaging.”

Due to its specific special qualities the suggested uses of this compound eye camera lens are as follows: high-res surveillance cameras to capture an expansive scene, all of which will be in focus. Also it is foreseen that such a lens would be useful for medical exploratory tools such as endoscopy cameras.

This first example of an insect compound eye was created on a flat flexible silicon sheet, with the individual microlenses bonded to retain their relative specific arrangement, before being stretched into a hemisphere by pneumatic pressure. The fire ant’s eye was a relatively simple endeavour to put together with 180 constituent lenses. To attempt to replicate a dragonfly eye would require 28,000 lenses! After this initial success the research team will look into the unique properties of “not only insect eyes, but also ocular organs found in other creatures in nature”.



HEXUS Forums :: 5 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Hmmm.. I can get an infinite field of view with my phone camera by focussing a few metres away.. is this just marketing speak?
What you are getting with your phone camera is a focal range from however number of meters to infinity, not an infinite depth of field. If you are focusing to infinity, the distance between you and where that focal plain starts will be out of focus. To get that bit in focus, the lens actually needs to move to get it in focus. With this lens, whether it is right next to the lens or miles away, it will be in focus. Meaning moving objects will always be in focus no matter where they are in the scene without the lens having to move to keep them clear.

The article suggests security cameras, so a person walking towards the camera would always be in focus at the same time as someone entering the scene at some distance would also be in focus without the camera/lens/operator having to do anything. This will make the lens/camera smaller, lighter and more reliable as there will be no moving parts.

Pretty clever stuff.
Hehe the bottom picture made me think “It's a trap!”
Funkstar
What you are getting with your phone camera is a focal range from however number of meters to infinity, not an infinite depth of field. If you are focusing to infinity, the distance between you and where that focal plain starts will be out of focus. To get that bit in focus, the lens actually needs to move to get it in focus. With this lens, whether it is right next to the lens or miles away, it will be in focus. Meaning moving objects will always be in focus no matter where they are in the scene without the lens having to move to keep them clear.

The article suggests security cameras, so a person walking towards the camera would always be in focus at the same time as someone entering the scene at some distance would also be in focus without the camera/lens/operator having to do anything. This will make the lens/camera smaller, lighter and more reliable as there will be no moving parts.

Pretty clever stuff.

Ok - having read the article properly on something other than my phone, it looks like they intend to use lots of lenses to ensure a wide field of view and a wide focal range. Surely this raises issues with the sensor? - is it expected to handle the image from each lens, presumably sequentially, or is there to be more than one sensor?
I'm yet to be convinced that bunging 180 lenses onto a camera, each with a different focal range/angle of view, is likely to offer much besides massive compromises, and many of the issues purportedly solved (wide FOV, massive focal range) have been solved via other means (wide angle lenses +/- small sensors will make a FOV so large it is to all intents and purposes infinite - e.g. from 20cm to infinite). For example, even my 60D will have a very large DOF at a fairly standard wide angle of 10mm and aperture of f5.6 - from less than 0.5m to infinity - and that is with a relatively large sensor; I'd expect greater still from your typical wide-angle CCTV.
It always amazes me what people can do with technology and biology