facebook rss twitter

Review: AMD ATI Radeon HD 5970 2,048MB graphics card: usurper of the throne

by Tarinder Sandhu on 18 November 2009, 05:00 4.0

Tags: ATI Radeon HD 5970, AMD (NYSE:AMD), ATi Technologies (NYSE:AMD)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qauv3

Add to My Vault: x

Final thougts and rating

When AMD launched the Radeon HD 5870 graphics card in September this year, we lauded it as a step forward. Now derived into a further three products, the DX11 architecture pervades the £100-plus space. 

The newest member of the R5K series is the Radeon HD 5970 2,048MB. Putting everything else subservient, its sole aim is to dethrone NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 295 as the fastest graphics card in the world.

Performance is based on marrying two Radeon HD 5800-class GPUs to one board, by taking a Radeon HD 5870's architecture and HD 5850's frequencies. In effect, it becomes a Radeon HD 5860 X2.

With 4.6TFLOPs of compute performance and other preposterously-huge numbers under the bonnet, our benchmarks show it to be, on average, 35 per cent faster than an also-dual-GPU GeForce GTX 295, based on DX9/DX10 and OpenGL titles and at the 2,560x1,600 resolution.

Zipping through benchmarks at 2,560x1,600, and you really need this kind of ultra-high setting to do the card justice, we can categorically say that it succeeds in usurping the GTX 295's title... and in some style. Indeed, the legendary Greek philosopher Socrates and NVIDIA's high-end GPUs have something in common: they've both been poisoned by Hemlock.

The effusive praise for the card's performance is tempered by a dose of healthy pragmatism, though. Radeon HD 5800-class GPUs are incredibly difficult to find in-stock, so we fear for the HD 5970's availability, in the short term at least.

Then there's the huge footprint, as wide as an ATX motherboard, which may leave would-be purchasers contemplating a new chassis just to house the card. Finally, at between £425 and £450 performance comes at a considerable price, and such an investment could be split over two Radeon HD 5850 GPUs - motherboard permitting - with change left over for a triple-A game or two.

But that's kind of missing the point. Practical considerations aside, and the ultra-high-end GPU market tends to be marked by a rather whimsical approach to judiciousness, the AMD ATI Radeon HD 5970 2,048MB becomes the fastest gaming card money can buy. Fermi, over to you.

Just a little later on today, we'll be casting our eye over the HD 5970's performance in dual-card CrossFireX, compared to practically all other high-end single- and dual-card solutions, to give you the complete picture.

HEXUS Rating

We consider any product score above '50%' as a safe buy. The higher the score, the higher the recommendation from HEXUS to buy. Simple, straightforward buying advice.

The rating is given in relation to the category the component competes in, therefore the AMD ATI Radeon HD 5970 is evaluated with respect to our 'extreme components' criteria.

90%

AMD ATI Radeon HD 5970 2,048MB


AMD ATI Radeon HD 5970 2,048MB

 

HEXUS Where2Buy

AMD ATI Radeon HD 5970 graphics cards can be ordered now from the following retailers:


As always, UK-based HEXUS.community discussion forum members will benefit from the SCAN2HEXUS Free Shipping initiative, which will save you a further few pounds plus also top-notch, priority customer service and technical support backed up by the SCANcare@HEXUS forum.

Prices start at £470.58
 
TBC
TBC
Prices start at £467.76
Prices start at £573.86
 
TBC

HEXUS Right2Reply

At HEXUS, we invite the companies whose products we test to comment on our articles. If any company representatives for the products reviewed choose to respond, we'll publish their commentary here verbatim.



HEXUS Forums :: 31 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
impressive card and nice to see the review up. Bit disappointed with the content in a few areas but ill not get into it here as it looks like im being aggressive. Who wants to see quake wars at the end of 2010? also could do with running a spell check on the content and the page names, typos in quite a few places. You also refer to the 5970 as 5890 on the bangforbuck tables.

Looks a bit rushed to me but ill not get into more detail.
god thats expensive.
Okay I was replying to someone else's post, but it doesn't appear when viewing the forum, only the article, perhaps I am using it incorrectly, heres what I wrote anyway…

I gotta say, that having a review of an older game is actually quite useful - perhaps it is a bit specific to certain users though. From me it makes it easier from a comparison perspective, and realistically people do not upgrade on every iteration of a technology, therefore if I wanted to compare my 3870 x2 to the 5970, then having the benchmarks of Quake Wars is very useful!
Maybe we should have benchmarks of Quake I while we're at it. :P

Seriously, if it can run current games at above playable framerates at maximum settings, then obviously any older game is going to be overkill framerate.
very impressive power draw at “tick over” and even flat out… nVidia must be working very hard to equal that card…. they need to be anyway.

It's a shame the X2 label has been dropped… it was one of the only parts of any graphics card lableing from any manufaturer that made any sense ;)