facebook rss twitter

UK High Court brings common sense to Apple vs All patent war

by Alistair Lowe on 5 July 2012, 10:18

Tags: HTC (TPE:2498), Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qabi7r

Add to My Vault: x

This time around, four patents were up in the air, as HTC took Apple to the UK High Court and, visa versa in a counter sue, in an attempt to invalidate European patents used as ammunition by Apple in a previous case in Germany. The four patents covered were for:

Firstly, the judge ruled that the fourth patent, covering bouncy images, did not apply in HTC's case. More interestingly, however, the judge found all three of Apple's remaining patents to be invalid, taking good note of the evidence we've all seen on YouTube, regarding the Swedish Neonode N1 handset, which featured slide-to-unlock since its release in 2004 or 3 B.i. in Apple terms, stating that the feature was an "obvious" development in light of the Swedish handset and, that the slider itself had already been employed by Microsoft in Windows CE.

A great victory for common sense, though, alas, being a product outside of the US, the Neonode N1 holds little clout in a US patent case and, is evidence unlikely to be presented; though, hopefully, the London-based case itself may be something Google and Samsung can use in the US to help fight Apple's preliminary injunction against the Nexus smartphone.



HEXUS Forums :: 20 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Thank goodness. This constant patent contest stifles creativity and harms the consumer.
there we are, all it takes is a non corrupt judge and one that actually looks at the case with common sense.
Thank god we finally have success! It was such a terrible patent, well all three were because i dont see how you can patent a slide to unlock with prior art, even patenting a multilingual keyboard… its madness! Of course it will be multilingual, you find alot of tacticle keyboards have more than one language and touch screens have had this for yonks! I love how Microsoft have pretty much all this “prior” art stuff covered as it was all implemented in their mobile OS all them years ago… stupid stupid Apple, just wait till you piss off MS and you will swiftly find that once your payments stop that you will be in the ground with no legal patents!.
o Unlocking a device by performing a gesture on an image.
o A system to determine which elements of a screen were activated by single-finger touches; which were activated multi-finger touches and which ignored touches altogether.
o The use of a multilingual keyboard offering different alphabets on portable device, including mobile phones.
o Letting a user drag an image beyond its limits and then showing it bounce back into place to illustrate that they had reached its furthest edge.
Firstly, the judge ruled that the fourth patent, covering bouncy images, did not apply in HTC's case. More interestingly, however, the judge found all three of Apple's remaining patents to be invalid
Good decision - victory for common sense. #1 and #3 especially are just plain daft things to grant a patent for.
the Swedish Neonode N1 handset, which featured slide-to-unlock since its release in 2004 or 3 … alas, being a product outside of the US, the Neonode N1 holds little clout in a US patent case and, is evidence unlikely to be presented
Sorry, surely “prior art” is still valid, irrespective of whether it's a US product, or that little backwater called the “rest of the world”. So if HTC etc don't use it then - as far as I'm concerned - they're fools and deserve to lose.

I presume that, by the same reasoning as the “prior art”, that a decision in an English court would count for zero in the US legal system.

Is there anyway to get this decision escalated EU-wide? That way, Apple wouldn't be tempted to refile in a German court - the sooner we see an end to these kinds of daft non-patents, the better I like it.
This case is in other countries around the world. Lets see what out comes are reached elsewhere to see which courts Apple owns….We all know they own the courts in California and on Germany.
Rather depressing that Apple have chosen to spend (a fraction of) their world beating mountain of cash on paying lawyers to try and stifle their competition. This is despite the fact that it's fairly clear much of their customer base isn't even interested in buying non-Apple alternatives anyway.